Tag Archives: Moro

Building the Lumah Mehe: A Moro Muslim Alternative to Seclusion and Integration

This is a sharing of my personal journey as Moro human rights defender and peace activist, and a reflection on the experiences of my organization as Muslim civil society, as well as that of our partner communities in our work in Zamboanga City and Basilan, Southern Philippines.

It’s neither the east nor the west

Islam is beyond the boundaries of culture, beyond because Islam is a way of life which inspiration permeates all religions and cultures. The universality of religious values and unity of religion is a recurring theme in the Qur’an. For one, it is a prerequisite for every Muslim to believe in all the prophets and the books of revelation.

It is in this context of the search for the universal message of Islam that I, as member of a minority ethnic and religious community is a predominantly Catholic state, have come to realize that it is neither in isolation and seclusion nor in superficial integrarion and mainstreaming that Islamic mission is accomplished.

The current social upheavals that have been convulsing the world have in many ways showed to us the ugly faces of globalization, westoxification, and its attending Islamophobia that rides on the bandwagon of world campaign against terrorism. Within the backdrop of the ongoing Moro Islamic Liberation Front-Government of the Republic of the Philippines (MNLF-GRP) 1996 peace agreement, and the aftermath of the events of 9/11, two streams of reactions among the Bangsamoro community emerged. Each reaction harnesses its own support from Muslim traditional leaders and political and religious intellectuals who have defined the Islamic flavoring for the Manila government, particularly in finding projects for peace and development in Mindanao and Sulu.

Isolation, seclusion, and superiority complex

On the one stream is the extreme tendency for isolation ism, seclusion, and persisting superiority complex among Bangsamoro Muslims.

Many Bangsamoro leaders and intellectuals have unfortunately(mistakenly) chosen culture, often that of the Middle East, over the universal ideals and values in Islam. With all due respect to my Muslim brothers and sisters, I take the risk of hurting a cultural sentiment —our famous Moro maratabba—and dare to criticize how often we have misused our identity as Muslims as an excuse for retaining old habits. Wecling to historical myths and refuse to reckon with the present realities of a multicultural and multi-faith Mindanao.

In the name of culture and religion, recalcitrant conservatism and orthodoxy have been preventing the ushering of genuine change by conveniently hiding the inadequacies of traditional systems of patriarchy and old ideologies, eventually perpetuating inequality and injustice in our very homes. The challenge to democracy and good governance last national elections is but one case in point. The world witnessed massive fraud in Philippine electoral politics under the blatant sponsorship of local leaders in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). Blind obedience in command voting is justified by misappropriating and wrongly attributing it to shura or consultation, and shamefully claiming it an Islamic obligation for literate leaders to rob the vote from illiterate followers. Outright cheating through vote-buying and hakot system is touted as exercise of democracy in Islam.

Mass ignorance of Islamic doctrine and the lack of knowledge of divine teachings even among progressive intellectuals have given full reign to ulamu and asatidz who arc vested the sole privilege of issuing opinions on contemporary political and social issues, which, more often than not, are characterized by deaf silence. Or, if ever any issuances are made, these are incoherent and confused mumblings.

A related issue to this is gender equality and reproductive rights where obscure and distorted Qur’anic texts and doubtful prophetic traditions have been carelessly quoted to disclaim that gender inequality exists in Moro society. Age-old a’dat or customary tradition persists because the voice of moral guidance is uncritical and silent. Meanwhile, women are routinely coerced to marry their abductors and rapists, or suffer in the hands of abusive husbands. Zeenah, otherwise known as crime of passion,is ambivalently defined. Having no adequate and proper legal assistance,women can be arbitrarily accused of tainting communal honor, providing enough reason for men to start a senseless war. Perpetually chained to their beds and kitchens, many Moro women, regardless of ethnicity or social status, continue to silently languish as they strive to be the ideal and submissive wives, daughters, and mothers. This culture of silence which draws approval by virtue of misappropriated Islamic wisdom has been a convenient excuse for denying women their rights in upholding their integrity as persons and in not entrusting them equal responsibility to lead and exercise reproductive roles in the family and society.

All these have continued because the Moro Muslims, on the veil of strangeness and given the mystery and sanctity shrouding its laws and culture, have the perfect excuse for impunity from scrutiny and criticism by rights’ groups or among the faithful who choose to use reason over blind submission to dogma and tradition. The same superiority complex has also persistently cast and excluded the non-Muslims as kafir.

Needless to emphasize, the challenge of the times is for us to come out from the shadow of this self-imposed seclusion and shed the false security in being of a different cultural mold.

Integration and mainstreaming Islam

On the other stream, we also have those who have succumbed to pacification and integration campaigns hook, line, and sinker. This strand comes from the Moro Muslim’s response to massive efforts toward Muslim integration in the peace and development projects in post-conflict Mindanao and Sulu, where most of the Official Development Assistance (ODA) and multi- and bilateral international donations go.Integration projects have taken the shape of mainstreaming the madrasa or including Islamic instruction in basic public education curriculum and in training teachers to teach Islam in the classrooms. It is also observed in the culture-sensitization of government programs by equally celebrating and promoting anything from the south that is Muslim,such as Muslim food, Muslim dances, and Muslim costumes, and in the legislative issuances for petty reforms such as public observance of Muslim holidays.

The more ambitious project of ushering in demobilized Moro combatants into national politics has proved to be a fiasco, exemplified by the incarceration of MNLF leader Prof. Nur Misuari and a number of MNLF ex-commanders now turned trapos. Though sounding magnanimous in name, these efforts have been lackluster, wanting in values and essence.

Time would not allow me to elaborate further than to say how the watered-down mainstreamed madrasa is faring in a national education system that is mired in its own crisis of quality and misdirected mission. The so-called Islamic values integration in the Revised Basic Education Curriculum (RBEC) are, at best, mere token of introductory Arabic grammar lessons, and in some cases, reducing lofty ideals of Islam to embarrassing antiquarian values. One clear fallout of this mainstreaming project has been the marginalization and the threatened obliteration of community-based religious education and home studies of Qur’an, where real value formation happens.

Yet another aspect of integration is in the power-sharing with Moro political aspirants and their participation in Philippine body politic. This prospered especially in turning Moro ideologues and mujahideens into politicians. As a result, we have dynastic monopolies entrenched in government positions where among the infamous cases in the island provinces in the ARMM have been husband-with-two-or-three-wives occupying choicest positions as congressman, governor, city mayor, and heads of strategic local government agencies.

In both streams of Moro Muslim responses, there seems to be a common denominator in demonstrating Islam as lame acts of external display of piety or as superficial cultural show of rituals and ceremonies. Worse, this Islam has become a mere dress code and stamps of clerical approval where to be Muslim or be Islamic is to be confirmed by the anointing powers of the ulama, the imams, the asatidz, or by just any male leader who identifies himself to be a Muslim.

Response from the Moro civil society

From where civil society stands in the periphery, these paradoxical streams of reactions put us at a crossroad. Our only choice as it appears now is to favor a stance allowing the voice of the grassroots to be heard. Without critically examining and reconstructing the local environment that breeds violence and injustice, the collaboration of Muslim religious leaders and intellectuals might have succeeded in accommodating a few into the Manila-centric government. However, such accommodation might fall into the trap of trivializing and diluting the mission in overhauling the system where the very roots of Dar-ul Kufur and human sufferings thrive.

On the other hand, the Bangsamoro nationalist cause has increasingly drifted towards elitism and isolation from the masses who come in and out of evacuation centers in hoards each time the Moro liberation fronts and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) declare a resumption of war. The social and economic costs of a long and protracted war put the Moro liberation movement in danger of losing its mass base, as hunger and deprivation render multitudes of civilians into apathy and desperation. Its factionalism within has deeply cleaved a sense of otherness even among Bangsamoro majority and minority ethnic groups. In stubbornly straddling its high horse, the Moro liberation movement carelessly disregards the Lumad and Christian settler’s questions and stake in the homeland, what with its exclusively of the peace process and non-transparency of its political and economic agenda for the autonomous republic it wants to build.

Crisis in development framework

As part of the civil society, there are at least two significant experiences of the Lumah Ma Dilaut Center for Living Traditions that I could share. Lumah Ma Dilaut is an affiliate of the Asian Muslim Action Network in the Philippines (AMANPHIL), which is a local chapter of the Asia-wide umbrella where Dr. Chandra Muzzafar and Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer are the founding fathers.

Like any self-respecting organization, AMANPMIL and Lumah Ma Dilaut went through a period of discernment in the midst of a crisis of framework that came in the wake of the declaration of the all-out war in 2000 and the continuing militarization in most of the countrysides in Bangsamoro villages. Despite the supposed lull and post-conflict reconstruction scenario in the aftermath of the 1996 peace agreement, violence marked the communities we worked with. This dilemma was intensified by the 9/11 attacks on US cities in 2001 when Islamic extremism was at its re-surging peak.

The first realization which came out of this discernment was the need to shift gears: From focusing our work in supporting what we have come to perceive as narrow politics of Bangsamoro nationalism, to continuing and reaffirming our rights-based approach to development and advocacy for peace based on social justice and equity. The Bangsamoro nationalist project has no doubt been an important ground for the intellectual and political maturation of the Moro activists, yet it is disappointing to see that its ideology and claimed aqueedah or faith-inspiration have yet to be translated into action on the ground.

The second realization was not only the need to emphasize secular approaches to our activism but also to broaden our perspectives and to ground our work in deep knowledge of Islam. First and foremost was the need to actualize our being Muslims working for human rights and building lasting peace based on social justice and equitability as mission towards humanity. In the process, we experienced a painful period of ideological and spiritual self-examination and, hopefully, renewal. Some of us stuck to the old mission of da’wah in the purely the line of the Moro nationalist political agenda. A few of us who were caught in between hung in limbo to see through the birthing of a humble and oft-sidelined program on women and children in vulnerable minority ethnic Moro communities. This rebirth became the Lumah Ma Dilaut Center for Living Traditions.

The creation of Lumah Ma Dilaut necessitated the dramatic transition of our educational work which, in AMANPHIL Culture of Peace (COP) Manual (2001), we described as applying the jihadic paradigm in a da’wah jama-a, with the unspoken mission of inviting non-Muslims to turn to Islam. AMANPHIL committed itself to human rights and development work using the Islamic perspective. The COP module it developed in 2001explored the concrete applications of Islamic precepts in development work and initially siiaped and defined its methods of work based on the principle of social change in the jihadic paradigm. Its vision of peaceful co-existence and process of social reconstruction is anchored in the concept of Tawheed or unity and holism.

From Qalam to KAALAM

In more concrete terms, the reform included shifting from QALAM to KAALAM. QALAM (i.e., inspired by a Qur’an verse The Pen) stands for Qur’an based Alternative Learning and Social Action module that AMANPHIL implemented in Jolo as a pilot study of integrating Islamic values into mainstream public secondary schools by trign to model a pesantren-type education and volunteerism project. KAALAM, acronym for Katutubong Alyansang Lumad-Moro para sa Angkop at Mapagpalayang Edukasyon, is translated as Lumad-Moro indigenous alliance for appropriate and liberating education. Lumah Ma Dilaut does not describe its work to be jihadic and the da’wah in promoting indigenous knowledge systems and practices and in modeling appropriate and empowering program for reviving the spiritual and cultural energies of the Sama ethnic communities. It is nonetheless a self-fulfillment for its mostly Muslim staff as their own personal jihad and a way of da’wah. We take pride in our home-made curriculum for the three iskul-iskul ma Lumah ma dilaut that we are nurture in small Sama Dilaut villages in Zamboanga City and Basilan. At iskul-iskul, we teach the values of pag-omboh or ancestral reverence, a form of animistic practice by the indigenous Sama Dilaut; we also imbue the learners with the appreciation and valuing of extent cultural traditions of the rural Muslim communities, for example the Taitih or Nisfu’Shaban (or remembrance of the dead) and the Rabbana tradition during Isra wal mi’raj. Side by side with teaching the basic Islamic pillars of faith, we tell stories of the Prophet Jesus’ nativity as narrated in Surah Maryan in the Qur’an. More than being religious these traditions and practices have been perfect opportunities for reinvigorating the spirit and binding the force for forging communal harmony.

Implications and challenges in community development work and peace advocacy

In a nutshell, these two strategic moves have great implications in our community work and peace and rights advocacy. First, the Lumah Ma Dilaut refuses to blindly submit to integration or mainstreaming into the national systems without first ensuring a systemic recognition, empowerment, and institutionalization of traditional systems of governance and justice, and in ensuring a place for the perpetuation of our indigenous knowledge systems and practices where values and spirituality that our faiths teach are embedded.

Second, it is suspicious of isolationist and elitist-sectarian moves . by nationalists, especially of agenda that pit oppressed communities against each other, pitch issues of Muslim-Christian conflict, or endorse Bangsamoro nationalist unilateral interests without due respect for the Lumad and other inhabitants in still much contested Moro territories or ancestral domains.

Third, we realize the need to give voice to the most marginalized, excluded, and vulnerable Moro communities. So we chose to work with the Sama Dilaut or Bajau. The Sama Dilaut, considered a Moro people only because of their traditionally plying the Sulu seas, is an interesting case. Narratives from the remnants of this passing traditional society portray a nostalgic story of their transition from sea-nomadism to urban mendicancy. The Philippine Bajaus are largely practicing an indigenous religion. Although a growing number are Islamized, most are only nominally Muslims mired in massive poverty and illiteracy. By and large, they are not considered a political threat by the national government on account of their non-integration into the Moro nationalist movement and their non-inclusion in traditional politico-social structure such as the sultanate or data systems. As such, they stake the least in power and prestige in current politics. Remaining as fluid, free-spirited communities, they are free citizens of the Malaysia-Philippine-Indonesia-Brunei Darussalam sea basin.

To us, the unique position of the Sama Dilaut could be the ultimate test of the limits of our political and economic tools for empowerment, challenging our sociocultural, even religious and spiritual, constructs of human development and human rights. At the psychological and moral level, it measures the sincerity of our intentions and the degree of tolerance that we put to volunteerism. In sum, it challenges the appropriateness of our framework for development and grassroots empowerment and in establishing social justice.

In closing, I would like to reiterate that empowerment does not lie in the seclusion and isolation of Islam in a political or nationalist cause, nor in integrating or mainstreaming Islam to the mold of a particular culture. It is erroneous and presumptuous even to say that as Muslim civil society, our project is to evolve an alternative Islamic ideology or Islamic culture as Islam cannot be reduced to a particular theory or cultural face. Our mission is to rediscover the universal message in Islam as the common thread, a unifying force, for all religions and cultures of the world to be comfortable and accepted. Our humble mission is to build a Lumah Niche, a big home that brings together every culture and religion into one big family of the Islamic way of life.

An Overview of Cultural Research on Mindanao

Cultural studies and research properly belong to the social sciences particularly the disciplines of ethnology, anthropology, archeology, and more recently, ethnohistory or culture change. A study of culture removed from its societal and human moorings is no longer acceptable hence, even in archeology where the primary focus is on artifacts, or the remains of man’s material culture as evidence of the past of the community or society, the relative value of the archeological evidence lies in the information or insights that it can provide by way of elucidating  the lifestyle or culture of the people to whom it belongs. Cultural research would then presume an underlying and ultimate interest in understanding man through a study of his culture. Indeed, it would not be an overstatement to say that man is only understandable through his culture.

Scientific cultural research in Mindanao was started by American anthropologists who arrived in the Philippines during the first decades of the present century. Otley Beyer, Fay Cooper Cole and Laura Watson Benedict were some of the earliest scientist who pioneered the study of culture in these parts.  The very proliferation of cultural groups indigenous to the island of Mindanao and Which at the time of Beyer, Cole and Benedict were practically in pristine stages served as the beacon to the first cultural studies undertaken.

We must not forget to mention the non-American and less scientific sources and writers such as the Spanish missionaries who preceded the American anthropologists. The Recollects and the Jesuits may not have been writing in any scientific or anthropological sense but their descriptions of the customs of the various “nations” so called in Mindanao are veritable sources of ethnographic and anthropological material that make up the substance of a baseline study. As every social scientist knows, studies of culture and social change are only as good as the available matrix or baseline data.

Unfortunately, most of the results of these studies have long ago been repatriated to the respective homelands of their foreign authors. A good example of this is the famous “Newberry Collection” at the Regenstein Library in the University of Chicago Illinois. A few researchers were gracious enough to leave copies of their works in Manila libraries and the National Archives.

After the war,and for reasons that can only be inferred or surmised, interest in cultural studies on Mindanao considerably  waned. A small number of trained Filipino anthropologists who were based in Manila universities turned up some exciting volumes on the cultural groups of the Cordilleras and Luzon in general but cultural research on Mindanao was conspicuously lacking. Some of the notable exceptions to this Luzon-centric interest were Espiridon Manuel who produced four book on the Bagobos (actually Guiangans) and Manobos of Davao and Marcelino Maceda and Rudolf Rahmann who studied the Mamanuas of Lake Mainit in the Surigao area. Linda Burton, an archaeologist based in Xavier University in Cagayan de Oro City, likewise performed a highly creditable work in the excavations of the pre-historic balangay in Butuan City the results of which are now contained for posterity in the Butuan City the results of which are now contained for posterity in the Butuan Historical Museum. My own modest contributions to contemporary cultural research on Mindanao is the Bagobos of Davao … the results of a five-year study of the Tagbawa Bagobo of Davao del Sur, and the Tambara, the Ateneo de Davao University Journal which is probably the only journal that publishes cultural studies on Mindanao. It would be remiss not to mention the Gimba, a quarterly magazine that also publishes cultural articles.

In brief, I wish to emphasize by this brief resume’ that cultural research on Mindanao leaves much to be desired. Below is a partial and preliminary bibliographical listing of cultural works on Mindanao. Since it is an annotated bibliography I think it will be very useful to those attempting to break ground in cultural research in Mindanao.

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

BAGOBOS

Benedict, Laura W. “A Study of Bagobo Ceremonial Magic and Myth”. Annals New York Academy. Vol. XIV (May 15, 1916)

The study deals with the mythological concepts of the Bagobos in the first chapter. In the second chapter, it delves into the rituals of human sacrifice, marriage, death and burial. Charms, diseases and healings, taboos, omens and dreams are the foci of the third chapter. The fourth chapter looks into the problems  of sources of  ceremonials and myths.

The author is of the opinion that throughout the continuous and unbroken communication between the mountain Bagobos and the coast Bagobos with other people together with the intermittent flow of whole families from the hills and mountains to the coast and from the sea back to the upland villages, the bagobos were able to preserve their old traditions and the integrity of the whole tribal religion. She attributed this largely to the presence  of the old chieftains  and to the existence of trade centers. Nonetheless, she believed that the death of several old datus and the transfer of entire mountain groups to provide native labor for American plantations were factors that brought about marked changes in Bagobo culture.

Cole, Faye Cooper. “The Bagobos of Davao Gulf”. The Philippine Journal of Sciences. Vol. VI (June 1911).

Cole, in great detail, described the various aspects of the Bagobo culture, namely: physical appearance and clothing; religious rites and practices; social structures; legal structure; birth and healing practices; dances and music; and beliefs.

___________. The Wild Tribes of Davao District, Mindanao. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1913.

This book represents an extensive study of the various tribes in Davao, among which are the Bagobos. It discusses the various aspects of their cultures.

HIGAONON

Baquiran, Lorettra L. “Bukidnon Designs.” Gimba: The Popular Magazine of Mindanao Culture. Vol. 1 (No. 1). Cagayan de Oro City: Mindanao Ethno-Culture Foundation. 1984.

This article os about the contemporary designs utilized by the Higaonon people. These designs are predominantly found in the group’s clothing and accessories.

Cole, Faye Cooper. The Bukidnons of Mindanao ed. by Paul S Martin and Lilian Ross. Chicago: Chicago Natural History Museum. 1956.

This is a study made at the time the Americans were forming the Higaonons into model villages and supplying them with plows and facilities for farming. The newly established villages were replicas of the more advanced settlements of the Christianized Bisayans. The datus or local headmen were being replaced by “elected” village officials.

Francisco, Juan. Notes on Culture Change Among the Higaonon, Vol. 1 (No. 1). 1990.

In explaining culture change among this people, the author touched on their practice of swidden africulture. He identified the months during which active farm work may be observed.

Lynch, Frank. trans. “The Bukidnon of North-Central Mindanao in 1889 (Letter of Fr. Jose Maria Clotet to the Reverend Father Rector of the Ateneo Mnicipal)” in Readings on the History of Northern Mindanao compiled by Renato Reyes y Bautista. Cagayan de Oro City: Xavier University. 1978.

The letter gives the reader a view of the various aspects of the culture of the Higaonon people : clothing and adornment, religious practices, marriage customs, weaponry and other artifacts, agricultural practices, tribal concept of justice and law, tribal etiquette, superstitios beliefs, dwelling places and burial rites.

MAMANUA

Rahmann, Rudolf, S.V.D. “Mamanuas of Northeastern Mindanao”. CMU Journal of Sciences, Education and Humanities, Vol. 1 (No. 2). 1990.

The author devotes a few pages of his work to a description of the crude kind of horticulture practiced by the Mamanuas. The kind of tools used depends on the type of crop. In addition, the Mamanuas gather all kinds of forest products.

MANDAYA

Valderrama, Ursula C. The Colorful Mandaya: Ethnic Tribe of Davao Oriental. Davao City: Tesoro’s Printing Press, 1989.

The book contains a discussion of the subsistence patterns of the Mandaya.

Cole, Faye Cooper. The Wild Tribes of Davao District, Mindanao. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1913.

This is a study of the various tribes in Davao, among which are the Mandayas. In this book the various aspects of the Mandaya culture are discussed.

MANOBOS

Arcilla, Jose S.J., ed./trans./annot. Jesuit Missionary Letters from Mindanao, Vol.1 (The Rio Grande Mission) Quezon City: Philippine Province Archives, 1990.

This book is a compilation of letters written by Jesuit missionaries doing work in Mindanao in the 19th century. Most of these letters treat of the ethnic groups found mostly in the mountains of Mindanao. The letters give the reader glimpses of the culture of the Manobos, among other tribes. Descriptions of their general appearance, clothing, farming practices, economic ventures, as well as dealings with neighboring tribal groups are also found. At the beginning, the Pulangi Basin was settled by the Manobos. The settlements were separated by natural barriers. Access to some of these settlements was made difficult by the hostile activities of the Moros.

Burton, Erlinda. “Gudgud: A Manobo Curing Ritual”.Gimba,Vol. 1 No. 1(November 1984).Cagayan de Oro: Mindanao Ethno-Culture Foundation. 1984.

This article discusses the procedure for carrying out the Gudgud ritual by describing in great detail one such event which the author herself had witnessed. The essence of the ritual lies in the umagad (soul) of a sick person being searched for and finally retrieved by the bybaylan (shaman) from the diwata or diwatas (spiritual beings) who may have snached or captured it to be devoured. The ritual is said to be performed because of the belief that unless the patient’s umagad is recaptured, he will never recover from his illness.

Cole, Faye Cooper. The Wild Tribes of Davao District, Mindanao.Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1913.

The book represents an extensive study of the various tribes in Davao, among them the Manobo. It contains an account of the history of these people.

Manual, Esperidion A. Manuvu Social Organization. Quezon City: The Community Development Research Council. 1973.

In discussing the social organization of the Manuvu, the author mentions in scattered portions of the book aspects of the “slash and burn” method of dry agriculturing engaged in by these people.

Garvan, John. The Manobos of Mindanao. Washington: United States Governmenr Printing Office. 1931.

The book treats of the great religious revival of the period between 1908 and 1910 among the Manobos of Libuganon River. It started with the “miraculous recovery” of a certain Manobo who had already been abandoned by his relatives because of his malignant sickness/disease. He attributed his recovery to the works of beneficient spirits. His people believed that he had been transformed into a deity who has such could impart himself to all whom he designed to honor.

He was later believed to have prophesied the destruction of the world after one moon and that the old tribal dieties would cease to lend assistance to all who garbed themselves in black (non-Christians), with instructions to his relatives as to how they could save themselves.

Dubois, Carl D. “Death and Burial Customs of the Sarangani Manobo”. Kinaadman: A Journal of the Southern Philippines, Vol. XII (No. 1). 1990.

The article deals with the various stages of the rites performed by the Sarangani Manobo for the sick, dying or dead person.

MORO

Gowing, Peter G. Mandate from Moroland.Quezon City. PCAS. 1977.

Gowing described the hostile activities of the Moros directed against the American colonial government in Mindanao in the 1900s and the corresponding reactions of the latter to such activities.

TIRURAY

Arcilla, Jose S.J., ed./trans./annot. Jesuit Missionary Letters from Mindanao, Vol. 1 (The Rio grande Mission) Quezon City: Philippine Province Archives. 1990.

The book is a compilation of letters written by Jesuir missionaries doing work in Mindanao in the 19th century. Most of these letters speak of the ethnic groups found mostly in mountains of Mindanao.

The letters give the reader glimpses of the culture of the Tiruray, among other tribes. Descriptions of their general appearance, clothing, farming practices, economic ventures, as well as dealings with neighboring tribal groups were the topics of many of the letters.

Schlegel, Stuart A. “The Traditional Tiruray Zodiac: The Celestial Calendar of the Philippine Swidden and Foraging People.” Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society. Vol. 15 (Nos. 1 & 23), 1987.

The articl contains a description of the subsistence economy, of the traditional Tiruray. (The acculturated Tiruray, on the other hand, plow their own, or, more commonly, their landlord’s established fields, repeatedly preparing, planting and harvesting the same plots of land.)

Schlegel, Stuart A. Tiruray Subsistence: From Shifting Cultivation to Plow Agriculture. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. 1979.

The book offers a contemporary case study of the transformation of a traditional economic system, as well as a glimpse into the day-to-day activities of the Tiruray, who have been compelled to change over from their traditional subsistence system (i.e. swidden agriculture) to sedentary farming.

Schlegel, Stuart A. Tiruray Justice. California: University of California Press, 1970.

The author liks the Tiruray sense of justice to their subsistence economy which is dependent on swidden agriculture, hunting, fishing and cathering of wild foods.