Tag Archives: Evangelization

The PMEs and the Tribal Filipinos

In declaring his Mission Perspectives in Mindanao Archbishop Antonio Ll. Mabutas took note of the particular character of the inhabitants of Mindanao and Davao; a majority of Christian immigrants and a native minority of Muslims and non-Muslims J He was quick to perceive that many of Davao’s economic and political problems were directly related to the human texture of the social environment. The so-called “melting pot” effect of the in-migration to Davao had not been very adequate. The post-colonial society assimilated only the migrant groups: the Visayans, llocanos, Tagalogs, etc. Set against more pronounced differences from the indigenous peoples of Davao the former seemed more successful in obliterating ethnic lines. The same could not be said however, of the latter who have retained most of their ethnic characteristics and identities, perhaps with more tenacity than before.

It seems as though the native non-Muslim peoples have been left out of the evangelization efforts, a charge which is easily refuted by the PME whose primary objective in coming to Davao was initial evangelization, i.e. the conversion of non-Christian tribal peoples.

The missionary effort of the Church has always been… to push back local frontiers and to penetrate ever deeper in the most remote areas of the world. In a very real sense Mission knows no boundaries and is a stranger to no people or culture. In this sense, the PME Fathers were not the first, nor the only missionaries to work among Tribal Filipinos in Davao . . . for the PME Fathers whose Project of Life states that ‘For us to live is to evangelize’, this effort of reaching out to all people, wherever they might live has always been a constant and enduring preoccupation.

Since their arrival in Davao in 1937, the PME missionaries have been striving to work not only in cities and among the Christian population but also in mountains and hinterlands among the widely dispersed cultural communities. As the least Christianized and westernized Filipinos, the Tribal Filipinos have been able to preserve many of their cultural traits: communal values on land, cooperative work exchange, the barter system, belief system, etc. Today, however, the forces of market economy and centralized government have slowly caught up with their traditional values and cultural traits.Lowlanders, settlers, and plain adventurers often supported by national laws, have occupied their communal lands, so have big corporations and government infrastructure projects. All have come in the name of progress, wisdom or civilization. The most immediate and obvious result, however, has been the erosion of their self-sufficiency and tribal identity, making ever wider room for a new dependence on modem ways and approaches.

Moreover, the tribal Filipinos living in the hinterlands, mountain slopes or peaks have all too often become victims of unwanted guests;rebels and members of military and paramilitary operations. They have been forced to regroup in artificial hamlets and pay all kinds of illegal taxation. These economic, political, and ideological assaults have left many Tribal Filipino groups helpless. Often they would sell their land to newcomers, or leave them in the face of a more acute adversity such as a military operation. Since their indigenous cultures are closely-bound with their communal lands, the loss of their lands means the loss of their cultural roots and identity. Ultimately, this would also deprived them of dignity as a full-fledged partner in Filipino nation-building.

The PME Fathers Among The Tribal Filipinos

Because of the ethnic composition of the region, it can be said that all the PME Fathers of Davao, have at one time or another come in contact and worked with Tribal Filipinos. The Mandayas of the old Christian town of Caraga, were the first native group to make the acquaintance of the PMEs. Boa, a small Mandayan settlement in the mountains of Caraga was the first to receive the visit of a PME priest:Fr. Yvon Guerin. He befriended the Mandayas and in due time recruited young people for the parochial school. During summer vacations, these Mandaya students would return home to share what they had learned with the community. Fr. Guerin’s students eventually became his first Mandaya converts.

In 1938, the RVM Sisters who were running the school in Caraga opened a dormitory for Mandaya girls. After the war in 1948, a dormitory for boys was also opened. By 1951, the dormitory had 70 Mandaya boys. Boa became the first barrio to form a Mandaya Christian community. The first Mandaya family to entrust its children to the care of the church was Tikilid whose son, Enrique Mariano was baptized in 1946. A sister, Badian, followed his example and was likewise baptized. In the course of his long association with PME Fathers, Tikilid became a good friend and eventually consented to be baptized himself. In 1951, he was chosen as the main actor for a PME production meant for Mission Education and Animation, in Canada.

In Cateel, Fr. Paul Guilbault prepared catechists to teach religion in the different schools of the parish. Through this program many Mandaya school children were catechised and baptized. Fr.Guilbault visited many Mandaya communities where he organized catechetics and celebrated the sacraments of baptism and the Holy Mass. In Lupon, Fr. Germain Pelletier, just expelled from Mainland China, worked in a special way among the Mandayas. His work also centered around Catechetics and the Sacraments.

Sometime in 1959, about forty Atas from Calinan came to visit the parish priest, Fr. Rolland Hebert and requested a catechist. Fr.Hebert sent Felipe Ranilo, a former student of Holy Cross of Calinan.Today, there are many Ata Christian communities in the Calinan area owing to his efforts. The present pastors of the Atas are the diocesan priests of the Archdiocese of Davao.

All too often, working in vast and remote places, undermanned and overworked, the missionaries never really had the time to adjust,and adapt their approaches or pastoral programs to the human and spiritual needs of the tribal peoples. While serving the cultural communities the PME Fathers used Cebuano in conversations and Latin in the liturgy as they would among the Christians of the lowland areas. Thus, it can be said that before the seventies, there was little or no attempt to focus the main effort on the inculturation of the Gospel to suit the particular needs of Tribal Filipinos. The merit of the missionaries lies in their interest and genuine concern for the latter, respecting their dignity and considering them fully worthy of the same pastoral care as the lowland Christians, the PME missionaries have always looked upon the Tribal Filipinos as an integral part of the flock.

In 1973, during a General Chapter, the PME Society revised its pastoral priorities and decided to give a new impetus as well as importance to initial evangelization, ie. the first proclamation of the Gospel message. Two years earlier, Fr. Pierre Samson was assigned to Caburan, Jose Abad Santos, Davao del Sur. He soon became aware that the vast majority of the population in the area was Manobo. Ashe began to pay visits to the Manobos, Fr. Samson exerted efforts to learn their native tongue. As he learned the Manobo language, the world of the Manobo opened up to him and Fr. Samson penetrated their cultural universe: language, cosmology, history and belief system. Fr. Samson carefully took notes of this cultural odyssey.Unfortunately, all these precious notes were lost when his convento burned down in 1974. Far from being discouraged, Fr. Samson started his work all over again visiting Manobo families and studying their culture. As he gained familiarity with various communities,he began to propose Evangelization Seminars to some of them. With his knowledge of Manobo language and culture Fr. Samson integrated certain aspects of Manobo culture in the seminar. To his immense satisfaction, the Manobos responded with great interest. Meybio, the first Manobo Christian community, was born in 1974amidst the growing political tension and rebel presence in the area.

Fr. Samson’s work among the Manobos included the production of books for the weekly Celebration of the Word, translation of Bible texts and composing liturgical songs. He inserted certain native symbols in the Ritual of Baptism and adapted some Manobo rites in the Liturgy of Marriage. In his work, Fr. Samson was greatly helped by Carl Dubois of the Summer Institute of Linguistics.Dubois published a Manobo Grammar in 1976 and the New Testament in Manobo in 1982.

Fr. Samson also made contacts with the B’laans (Bilaan) of Don Marcelino and Malita and lived in a small B’laan community in Little Baguio, a barrio of Malita. He stayed with the B’laans for three months during which he studied and learned the B’laan language. As with the Manobos, Fr. Samson organized Evangelization Seminars for the B’laan. In 1977, the first B’laan Christian community was bom in Little Baguio, up in the mountains of Malita. There Fr. Samson also translated Bible texts, prepared booklets for songs and worship in B’laan tongue and composed a special blessing for seeds and planting rites. Today there are six B’laan Christian communities in the Malita-Don Marcelino area.

When the Tribal Filipino Apostolate in Caburan was turned over to the Diocesan Clergy of Digos in 1983, Fr. Santos Villahermosa took over the work began by Fr. Samson in Jose Abad Santos. Fr.Samson remained among the Manobos and B’laans of Don Marcelino and Malita and continued his work until June 1985 when his apostolate abruptly came to an end due to his election as the Superior General of the PME Society.

Another of the PME Fathers to work among the Tribal Filipinos Mission is Fr. Gilles Belanger who arrived in Malita in 1977. Fr.Belanger was assigned to work among the Tagakaulo. Fr. Belanger spent four month in Sangay, a barangay of Malita, living with a family of Tagakaulos where he learned the language. Hewing closely to the evangelical trail set by Fr. Samson, he visited many native Tagakaulo communities, preparing liturgical and catechetical texts,composing songs, and translated the Synoptics along with the Rituals of Baptism and Marriage where a few cultural adaptations were introduced. In 1979, Macul became the first Tagakaulo settlement with a small Christian community. Today, there are twenty-two Tagakaulo Christian communities in Malita.

In an interview with Fr. Belanger held in Malita, he spoke of his work:
A reflection on the main purpose of our work as missionaries mademe take up work with Tribal groups. I saw myself as being able to work in the mountains. I strove to learn die language as soon as I came in 1977. At Sangay where 1 studied the Tagakaulo tongue my knowledge of Visayan helped a great deal in learning to speak the Tagakaulo language. I did a lot of listening. Everybody wanted to teach me. Later on they seemed to have become bored. I discovered that they respond easily when you talk to them about their own culture.

Our point of entry is to build a chapel for their fiesta. Then we give seminars where we compare some of their cultural values with Christian values such as creation, concept of women, man’s role in creation,etc. Through animation we talk about who they are, using the Bible as point of reference.

As missionaries we opted for proclamation of the word but tried to adapt it to the culture of these people. We made them understand also that we are interested as well in their material well-being.

Some of their positive values are consistent with Christian ones, for example, hospitality. We regard as negative values the idea that fiesta is seen as a status symbol and their apparent readiness to abandon their native culture. Their sense of community Is evident in practices such as the tabo (weekly market). They also like to come together for other social events.

In 1982, Fr. Pierre Fisette arrived to join Fr. Belanger in the Tagakaulo mission. Fr. Fisette took up residence in Sta. Maria and stayed with a native family in Barangay Kilegbeg in order to learn Tagakaulo. In four months he learned the language and like Fathers Samson and Belanger he travelled extensively in his area going as far as Malegang and Malungon. In the course of his travels and work among the Tagakaulos he was able to compile about 10,000 Tagakaulo words. Fr. Fisette plans to produce a Tagakaulo-Cebuano-English dictionary. In 1986, he transferred to Malita and started to work among the Tagakaulos in the municipality. His former apostolate in Sta. Maria was taken over by Fr. Roberto Lagos, a priest of the diocese of Digos. Now there is a total of 41 small Christian Communities all over the municipalities of Sta. Maria-Malita.

Our ^preach is one of integral evangelization. We see development as a holistic process, including the spiritual as well as the material. The point of entry is often literacy. We work with little groups instead of the whole population. The Tagakaulos place a lot of importance on health and long life; their prayers are invariably concerned with these. We form the Basic Ecclesial Communities (BCC) or the *Gagmayng Kristohanong Katilingban* (GKK) to develop the proper attitudes for self-reliance. Don’t wait for the priest to come in order to go to church. Don t wait for the government to build your .roads (Build them yourselves).’ Our GKK is global in the sense that it is concerned with every aspect of their daily lives. The lituigical aspect is only one.The other aspects are catechetics, health, literacy and agriculture.These five aspects comprise our approach of integral evangelization.These are the five poles around which our communities revolve. Not all our communities possess the five, but many have at least three.

Our goal is helping the Tagakaulos help themselves. We try to wean them away from money and material values. The best means to bring this about is to “bring them the Good News”, which is the message that they can become better human beings by improving what is already in their environment and in themselves. How to announce the “Good News” tied up or within the context of the whole human situation is our challenge. How to link life inside and outside the Church is part of this challenge.

We try to bring about challenge by means of example. When the Church promises something we see to it that the Church’s promise is kept. We think it is very important to build trust and confidence for the Church as such. When we say we will come to a certain place at this day at this time, we come. If the people are not there, we wait for them. The people come to trust our word. We also try to foster another kind of communal awareness: On social occasions or when we gather the people to build a road we encourage them to share what each one has with the others, so that one eats not only what he has brought himself but tastes and eats of what others have prepared.

We have noted that native beliefs are deeply ingrained among them,and for that matter, even among our own catechists. So we are emphasizing the behavioral as well as the theological aspects of Christianity.Of the sacraments, the hardest to teach is matrimony, that is, its monogamous aspect. The easiest to teach is penance; they have a keen sense of their sinfulness. We appeal to the whole person in the context of his human situation, including the transcendent as well as the personal and social dimension.

Catechetics, Social Action, Evangelization and Team Work

As time and experience showed, Initial Evangelization had to go hand in hand with Catechetics and Social Action Programs. From the very start a special effort was made to recruit catechists, people who would continue the work achieved during the Evangelization Seminars. In 1974, Narcisa Ambong, a newly graduated Manobo professional catechist started working with Fr. Samson. In 1979, Lolita Moto, a non-professional but experienced Tagakaulo catechist, teamed up with Fr. Belanger. In 1980, she was followed by another non-professional Tagakaulo catechist, Corazon Agravante. In 1983,Lucia Cejas, a Cebuano professional catechist, learned the Tagakaulo dialect and started to work with Fr. Fisette.

The tribal Filipino Apostolate of the Diocese of Digos received a big boost in 1980 when the Missionary Sisters of the Immaculate Conception (MIC) committed themselves to this type of work. The first Sisters to arrive in Malita were Sister Socorro Carvajal and Siste rEstela del Bando. After four months of exposure and language studies in sitio Kaigtan, Sister Socorro, with diplomas in Education and Catechetics, began to work with Fr. Belanger among the Tagakaulo. Lolita Moto entered the Missionaries of Charity Sisters, Corazon Agravante went into Catechetics. In 1983, Sister Eulalia Loreto,MIC,a professional catechist, after two years of work and pastoral experience among the natives of Miyarayon in Bukidnon, arrived in Malita. After learning Manobo in Caburan, she started working with Fr. Samson.

Today, the Tribal Filipino Teams of the Diocese of Digos are composed of the following. Among the Manobos of Jose Abad Santos: Fr. Santos Villahermosa, DCD, and Miss Norbelita Onari,a Manobo catechist. Among the Manobos and B’laans of Don Marcelino and Malita: Fr. Gilles Belanger, PME, Sister Eulalia Loreto,MIC, and Miss Tita Limbudan, a B’laan professional catechist.Among the Tagakaulo of Malita: Fr. Pierre Fisette, PME, Sister Socorro Carvajal, MIC, and Lucia Cejas. Among the Tagakaulo of Sta.Maria: Fr. Rudy Tulibas, DCD, Elsa Albaracin, a Tagakaulo professional catechist, and Fe Dubuque, a Cebuano professional catechist.

In another part of the Diocese of Digos, other PMEs have recently started work among Tribal Filipinos – namely the B’laan group. In1986, Fr. Gervais Turgeon, in Matanao, started two small communities in Colonsabac and Datal Pitak. This year he added Literacy Programs in these two areas. In Magsaysay, the neighboring municipality, Fr. Donald Bouchard has also started work among the same tribal group. He is planning to give an Evanelization Seminar and thus set up a new community in January 1988.

Even though Evangelization Seminars and Catechetics were first in the Initial Evangelization process, there was always a special preoccupation, a special effort to touch, to uplift the total human condition of the people. Social Action programs, especially literacy and health always accompanied the formation and process of the Small Christian Communities. In January 1985, three Social Action Projects were formally launched. These represented a special and official effort by the Church of the Diocese of Digos to improve the everyday lot of the Tribal Filipinos of the region. These programs are Health, coordinated by Rose dela Cruz and assisted by Linda Garcia,with Edita Flores as professional Midwife; Literacy, with Narcisa Ambong; and Agriculture, with Rosino Talima. Their offices are in Malita but their work extends to all the Tribal Filipinos from the mountains of Sta. Maria to the hinterlands of Jose Abad Santos.

From the start, there was a deep-felt need to prepare the future.Those working among the Tribal people were always looking for companions. People who would be with them to help them. Necessarily, these would be people from within each Tribal group who need to pursue their studies and prepare themselves for the future.For High School students, two main projects have been put up: one in Sta. Maria for the young Tagakaulos, and one in Caburan for the Manobos and B’laans. These young adults study in the parochial High Schools and live on a small farm. They help pay for their education by farming backyard gardens and taking care of domestic animals. With the help of the Presentation o^ Mary Sisters, catechists, and priests, the students meet regularly to deepen their faith, reflect on their culture, and their role as Christian Tribal Filipinos. A system of scholarships has also been initiated for students in college. Today,there are young Manobos, B’laans, and Tagakaulos studying Catechetics. Education, and Midwifery. In 1988, the plan is to send one student to study Social Sciences. The main idea is to prepare a human reservoir of knowledge and talents among the young Tribal Filipinos.These are expected to go back to their respective communities after their studies to teach, guide, and help the others along the difficult road of tribal independence, and national integration, and Gospel values. Some have graduated and are already working, especially in the field of catechetics and literacy.

Perhaps, the best way to get a real understanding of this apostolate with the Tribal Filipinos of Davao del Sur initiated by the PME Fathers and now joined by so many others is to present this poem of Fr. Fisette.

AROUND HARVEST TIME

August. Thursday. Eight in the morning. Still early.
I enter Kilalag. Tagakaulo country.
So near and yet so far.
It rained all night long.
I walked. One hour and thirty minutes.
From Sangay to Kaigtan: how muddyl A real chocolate parfait!
And then, Mahayahay, Kitulali, Swollen rivers.
On my shirt sweat and salt have mingled. Blended.
They have sketched their presence in long, jumpy, greyish lines.
Like a silent monitor describing a heart beat.
My boots, my jeans, my packsack . . . They also have tasted the trip.

Kilalag. Mountains and rivers.
Nineteen hundred and seventy-seven I remember.
There was nothing here. Or almost.
Nonoy and his family. One boy and four girls. Still young.
A small sari-sari store. A grinding stone.
Two classrooms. Without chairs.
Four horses. And many dogs.
Ten years already.

August. Thursday. Eight in the morning. Still early.
I walked. Yes.
But not alone. Lucia and Socorro were walking too.
With me. By my side. We were together.
Then Abelardo joined us. Then Dodong and his wife.
And leaders and animators and catechists.
Mamuiidas, Caret, Ginal. Paabay.
Twenty-five. Nineteen. Twenty-three. Twenty six years. Still young.
Dimuluc, Taguntungan, Kangko…. new communities.
Four years. Three years. Two years. Still young.
It rained there too.
Bare feet, net bags. 6ne small fish, one small egg. In a banana leaf.
Mud and rivers…. It was for them too.

Nine in the morning. Still early.
We are diirty-one.
All six small communities are present.
Outside, the sun is hot, splashing its rays all over.
A soft breeze touches soil and shoulders.
On the other side of the narrow path,
five meters from here.
Men and women appear.
Big baskets strapped around their heads.
Big baskets hanging on their backs.
They are three, seven, ten, eighteen. Together.
August. Mountains.
Kilalag. Tagakaulo country.
Harvest time. Rice. The magic word. The magic grain.
How good the thought. How sweet the smell.

They slide their fingers along the stems,
press the grains hard.
And throw them behind — in their backs
— in their big baskets.
Hands bare. Hands full.
New rice. Rice of die year. Rice of this year.
Toni^t new flames will crack old wood.
There will be a new perfume in the house.
Tonight it will be fiesta.
The first grains will be offered to Tyumanem: The Great Planter.
There will be prayers of gratitude. Short but deep.
There will be plenty to eat
And music will fill the heart.

Our meeting place is a little Chapel
It is sown right here.
Right in the middle of the rice field.
Our sharing is alive. And lively.
The Bible: Moses: I have seen the misery of my people.
Amos: So we can sell the poor for a pair of sandals.
Paul: Love is patient. Love understands everything.
Leaders. A promised land. Regrets. Deportation … A midnight star.
Jesus: The Kingdom of God…. a seed, a yeast,
two fish, five loaves of bread.
A few grains .. . This is my body. Given for life.
Literacy. Evangelization. Hygiene. Agriculture. Catechetics.
Nineteen hundred and seventy-seven.
Kilalag. A country without communities. Hungry.
May. June. July. A country without rice. Hungry.

Ten years. It passed.
So fast.
Today, six communities. Thirty-one leaders.
Woman. Men. Baptised. Young. Generous.

It is already four in the afternoon.
And we are in the mountains.
Eight in the morning. Still early.
Four in the afternoon. Late already.
Our meeting has to end: home is far away.
Each one leaves. Until next month. In Taguntungan.
We are all pieces of humanity
And it is only when we come together
that we are what we become.
Life is like that. We know.

Outside, in the rice field.
On the other side of the narrow path,
The big baskets are almost full.
It was a hot day. Slopes were steep.
And now backs are heavy
and hands are sticky.
But is was a good day.
A day of flesh and blood.
A day of food.
Ten years, one day. A rice field, a Chapel.
Mamundas, Moses.
Rice, Bread.
Feet walking the land, hands pressing the grain.
Foreheads sweating, knees trembling, backs bending.
Eyes smiling, hearts beating.
Around harvest time.

The Tribal Filipinos Mission in Malita, Davao del Sur

Presumably one of the largest parishes in the Diocese of Digos,the Sto. Rosario P^sh in Malita serves as a center for the Tribal Filipinos missions in the while province of Davao del Sur. Malita coordinates the different tribal Programs of Caburan, Sta. Maria,Don Marcelino, and Malita itself. There are three PME Fathers who discharge the various functions of parish and missionary work: Fr.Jacques Doyon, Fr, Pierre Fisette, and Fr. Gilles Belanger. The Fathers have divided the work in order to optimize their time and other resources. The administration of the parish itself is undertaken by Fr. Doyon while Fr. Belanger and Fr. Fisette handle the B’laan and Manobo; and Tagakaulo missions respectively.

The Tribal Filipinos missionary work may be perceived in two broad categories: catechetical and social action. Opening a tribal mission is initiated through contacts. For this purpose, the first job of the missionary is to travel extensively in his area of assignment in search of friendly communities. In the course of his sojourn and frequent association with native communities, some would eventually signify their willingness to attend an Evangelization Seminar, or the priest himself could identify one or two such communities for which such a seminar would be fruitful.

For more formal visits, the missionary brings with him trained catechists who make several more visits to the community by themselves before a seminar is actually given. The parents are asked to *signa panaad,* a promise to allow their children to be catechised and to support the program actively. The seminar proceeds in two phases: one for beginners, and a second one for a core group. The initial seminar is held at the Malita parish, and the second, in the native community.

Certain considerations require that the participants be recruited from among the young adults in the community who have had at least three years of primary education. Those who graduate from the seminar become the catechists of their own community. Catechetical instructions are usually held in the community chapels for want of schools and are intended for children. There are at present no resources for undertaking adult catechesis. The community is expected to share the modest obligations of catechetical work; in particular, they are asked to contribute something for the remuneration of the catechist. The parish shoulders the major financial burden of the seminars.

The basic content of the seminar is the proclamation of the Word of God, taking into consideration the native beliefs and the culture as a whole. During Bible sharing sessions the local problems of the community are discussed; thus, the Word of God is contextualized.The most commonly discussed problems are early marriage and personal conflicts for which reconciliations are worked out in the same sessions.

The social action component is dispensed through three major programs: literacy, agriculture, and health. This phase usually follows catechetics once the community has been a little organized already.The Literacy Program lasts three years and has three grade levels.The program is attached to formal education, and its more promising graduates are recommended to the public schools upon accreditation by the Department of Education, Culture and Sports. All teachers are employed by the Program which is under the administration of the Parish. They are given a “model house” in the community where they reside as a member of the community they serve.

The agriculture and health programs follow the same procedures as the Literacy Program. The Agriculture Program trains from three to six people from the community in some modem technology such as sloping agriculture and backyard farming. Health visits are an important component in the program, and the campaign is focused on sanitation and herbal medicine. The evangelization dimension is present in every aspect of the program. The activities are often begun with a prayer. There is an integration of faith and action.

The main problems of the programs seem to arise from cultural idiosyncracies and practises: The inferior status of women in the community inhibit them from active participation, while early marriages (many young girls are married at the age of twelve or thirteen) account for nearly all of the drop-outs. Among the native institutions that the catechists and trainors have found to be inimical to the natives is the makabatog. a local broker to whom the Tagaka-ulos look for good business opportunities such as profitable barter deals; credit, or marriage arrangements when they have sons or daughters of marriageable age. Since the nature of the makabatog’s profession or social station requires him to be a well traveled individual, the Tagakaulos also seek him for information about the outside world and usually regard the makabatog’s words with authority.

The social action staff of the Tribal Filipinos Mission perceived the makabatog however, as an exploiter of his own people, and therefore a menace to his own community. For the marriages that the *makabatog* arranges, Tagakaulos are often willing to incur huge debts misled by the *makabatog’s* words on the desirability, or profitability of a marriage arrangement.

A Day In the Lanipao Mission

Lanipao is a barangay of Malita that nestles in the mountainous regions of the municipality. It is the nearest barangay to Malita that is completely populated by Tagakaulos and is one of the places in which the PME Fathers have established a Basic Ecclesial Community. Last August 16th, the editors of this journal went to visit theMission with its missionary, Fr. Pierre Fisette.

About an hour’s drive from the Malita Parish, the trail to Lanipao starts from a small stream. Our party alighted at a lay leader’s house in Talugoy and from there, we picked up the trail. For the first two hours we followed the course of the stream, walking sometimes on its banks but most of the time in the stream itself. After a while the significance of the name Tagakaulo (dwellers of the origins of rivers)dawned on us; we were following the river or the stream to its source up in the mountains.

There were a number of Tagakaulo settlements all over the mountain sides. We were told that we had only one more hour of walking, but that was a steep ascent along mountain passes which in several places were no wider than foot paths at the edge of deep ravines. As the morning progressed, the heat of the sun grew more severe. The barren mountain sides accentuated the heat. The mountain climb was difficult for us and caused a delay in our schedule. In order to complete the day’s journey we had to budget our time wisely, leaving allowances for the main purpose of the trip; to visit a Tagakaulo community and experience the liturgy conducted entirelyin the native language.

A few hundred yards away from the nearest patag (flat land) an unexpected help came. Imoy, one of the Tagakaulo lay leaders,appeared on the path to help us reach his community. He had been waiting for our arrival. He decided to meet us on the trail intuiting the difficulties that we were presently undergoing.

At last we reached the community chapel, a nipa and bamboo hut filled with about thirty to thirty-five native Tagakaulos who have been evangelized in their own native tongue by our host, Fr. Fisette,who speaks Tagakaulo. We started to greet one another in Visayan,unable to speak Tagakaulo. Before the mass we were offered some repast at the house of the schoolteacher. For this we had to do more climbing as the schoolteacher’s hut was located about two hundred meters from where the chapel stood.

The mass was truly a community celebration. It was began byFr. Fisette,_and the people were active participants throughout the whole liturgy. The Tagakaulos read biblical texts and sang songs which have been translated into their own language. The first part ofthe mass was conducted by the Pangulo sa Liturhiya who integrated a “question time” on biblical passages in the short celebration. The entire mass was in Tagakaulo. After the mass, Fr. Fisette spoke to the people about the upcoming fiesta and asked them about the progress of the literacy, health, and agriculture projects. This was integral evangelization in practice.

We were deeply impressed by the stark simplicity of the whole proceedings. By then it was noontime, and with a mixed feeling of gratitude and anxiety we accepted two lunch invitations and went to climb two more mountaintops to reach our hosts’ houses. At two o’clock in the afternoon we started the homeward trek. The skies were threatening, but fortunately it did not rain. Imoy, who had helped us climb the mountain, now together with a companion,assisted us in making the difficult journey down. By then, we were totally exhausted. We could not have made it down without a helping hand.

Back in the convento at Malita, we reflected upon the experience.Despite threatening clouds in the afternoon, it did not rain the wholeday. We shuddered to think what rainfall would have done to themountain trails that we had been climbing.

Setting aside what had not happened, we reflected on whatactually transpired. We accomplished our main purpose for the visitto Lanipao, which was to experience a day in the life of the Tagaka-ulos and a liturgy that was entirely in the native tongue. It was avaluable experience well worth the physical exhaustion together withthe dangers that we were exposed to. We wanted the experience as akind of situationer, and an immersion process for writing about thehistory of the Christianization of Davao.

Some days after we had visited Lanipao, several of the TribalFilipino Health workers went there for a special project. The peopletold them all about our visit. They were very grateful for the effortswe had made to visit them, realizing the difficulties we had encountered. They liked our participating in the liturgy, especially trying tosing the liturgical music in Tagakaulo. They were very sensitive toour every reaction.

The one image that remains is the image of Imoy, meeting us onthe mountain trail, helping us up the mountain, and Aen accompanying us down, the image of the helping hand. The Tagakaulo reaching out to help the struggling guests to be with them, helping them with a quiet strength and dignity, helping them with a deep sensitivity.

What an enriching experience this was for us. The entire day wasan experience of an appreciation of nature as well as an encounterwith a new culture. As we walked with Fr. Fisette, we thought aboutPME missionaries who have made and are still making similar journeys throughout the Davao region, helping establish Christian communities, bringing the Church’s presence to many places. It was aninsight into the mission and work of the PME Fathers.

The PMEs in Jolo

Two years ago, in 1985, the PME Fathers undertook a newmission; to join ie Oblates of Mary Immaculate (O.M.I.) Fathers in working in the Prelature of Jolo in a population that is overwhelmingly Muslim. The four P.M.E. Father are Jacques Bourdages, RealLevesque, Robert Piche, and Andre Rondeau.

It was a new venture for these missionaries to move from a regionoverwhelmingly Catholic, alive with dynamic pastoral activities,employing many innovative pastoral approaches in forming BasicEcclesial Communities and developing lay leaders, and caring pastor-ally for tens of thousands of parishioners to a region overwhelminglyMuslim in population with a Church that is only a tiny minority.Aside from caring for tiie small Christian community present inJolo, the main apostolate is one of witness and dialogue. The Oblateshave done tremendous witness work especially in education, establishing the Notre Dame schools which have been responsible for theeducation of many of the Muslims. The Muslims are very gratefulfor this. The new venture is very challenging. The four PMEs havelearned Tausug and are now assigned to missions: Fr. Bourdages inBongao, Frs. Levesque and Piche in Siasi, and Fr. Rondeau in Bato-bato.

In our interview with Fr. Bourdages, he said that the PMEs arestill in a period of adjustment to this new mission, adjustment tothe new language, to the culture, to the people, to tlie local conditions. He sees the main purpose of his work as being able to givewitness that Christians and Muslims can live together in harmony.He sees the special gift that the Church has to give to the Muslim Community is the value of Christian forgiveness. He said that the value, even the word, does not exist in the Muslim world. This isthe special gift the Church has to share with the Muslims. This sharingmust be given in terms of witness.

CONCLUSION

To write history as a synchronic performance is not the intentionin writing the history of the Christianization of Davao. The abstraction of historical facts or their synchronization must rest ultimately,on individual interpretation. To do otherwise would be to commit aninjustice to the significance of the historical past. The writing of theChristianization of Davao beginning in the 17th century up to thecontemporary and present periods, is an attempt to contextualizethe labors of the Catholic missionaries as well as the evangelizationprocess itself within the social or collective experience of the people.The implicit assumption is that Christianization, together with its successes or failures, its strengths and weaknesses, could only beviewed, and eventually understood upon consideration of a dialectical reality as its context.

The Christianization of Davao began in the 17th century in theeast coast where the Spaniards had already laid political claims oncertain communities such as Caraga, Tandag, and Cateel. The early missionary efforts of the Recollects, and later, the Jesuits, were written as part of the social and religious history of the people.Contextualizing the events means describing the occurrences within the purview of the political, economic, and cultural institutionsexisting at the time. It was necessary as well, to write not only of theevents themselves but of the mutual impact that they had on oneanother. The purely religious events created an impact on the non-Tagakaulo woman and childreligious affairs of the community, and vice-versa. Hence, the Christianization of Caraga in the 17th century evoked associations with thepolitical unrest that periodically flared into violent confrontations between the native populations on one hand; and the politico-religious estalbishment on the other.

The native population of Davao, and in particular its ethnic composition at this time was an important dimension of this history.The description of the native Caragans, Bilaans, Manobos, Tagakaulos,etc., help established the evolutionary change that happened to the indigenous peoples. The transformation of some of them into the Christian Davaoeno of present times is an account of the accultura-tive process of Christianization.

The conquest of the Davao Gulf in mid-19th century enabled theSpaniards to penetrate the southeastern interiors of Mindanao. This event was a most important achievement of the period. It madepossible the extension of Spanish influence from the east coast to about a third of the whole island of Mindanao. After this, Christianity made significant headways to the western half of the island, a predominantly Muslim territory. Heretofore, Christianity would be firmly entrenched on the whole eastern half of Mindanao.

The American period which began in the 20th century initiallyresulted in some unfavorable changes for the growib of a now highlyvisible Catholic church. On the whole however, the setbacks weretemporary and insignificant. With the arrival of the missionaries ofthe Foreign Society of Quebec towards the end of the 1930’s, thefurther and unimpeded growth of the Davao Church was assured.The renewed evangelization of Davao was begun in the last decadebefore the end of the colonial period in Philippine history.

This account has focused on the efforts of the PMEs who played a major role in the development of the Davao Church. Althoughthe present Church owed as much to the evangelizing efforts of otherreligious congregations, it was the Foreign Mission Society of Quebecwhich laid the more solid foundations of the Davao Church. By laying emphasis on the development of the native clergy and the activeinvolvement of the community in the church, the PME Society hassecured the basic framework for building the local church. Morerecently, the PME has reprioritized its concerns. It has renewed itsinterest in initial evangelization, hence the birth of the Tribal Filipinos Mission. With this the Christianization of Davao has comefull circle, the nearly forgotten indigenous communities of Davaowho were supposed to have been the first beneficiaries of evangelization have once again become of primary concern. – Heidi K. Gloria

EPILOGUE: “FOR US TO LIVE IS TO EVANGELIZE”

To celebrate fifty years of evangelizing presence in the localChurch of Davao is a special moment. It is a remembrance of the years, the personalities, the events, the difficulties, the achievements,the challenges, the special graces, God’s presence, the response. Yet,to remember the past is also to cherish the present and to look forward to the future. The call and the challenge take new forms, butthey never cease.

Remembering

As Fr. Allary said in the Foreword, fifty years in the history ofthe Church or in the life of a people is very brief, but fifty years inthe life of the Foreign Mission Society of Quebec is a significantperiod because it is fifty years of building up the local Church ofDavao and turning it over to the local diocesan clergy.

In interviewing Frs. Allary and Picard for this study, 1 askedabout the special contributions of the different Regional Superiorsto the pastoral orientations and directions of the PME Fathers inDavao, and I was very impressed by their response.

What was accomplished in Davao was the work of the PME Fathers, all of them. Do not focus on the Regional Superiors. Everything we did, we did together. We would meet every month. Any new undertaking, any new apostolate would be presented to the Fathers. If they supported it, they would try it and encourage it in their parishes, orthey would give it financial support. If they did not support it, it did not succeed. Not that we had unanimity at all times. We made some mistakes, but we worked together. This gave us tremendous support.

Thus, we have an example of authentic communal discernmentPerhaps, this is the reason for the PME’s pastoral achievement in theDavao Church. What was accomplished was accomplished by thePME Fathers together, not individually. Each of the PMEs gave theirunique contribution. There is no need to focus on the RegionalSuperiors; there is no need to focus on the Fathers who had workedin Davao and had become Superior Generals of the PME; there is no need to focus on the Fathers who had worked in Davao and hadbecome Bishops; there is no need even to focus on one of the twoFilipino PMEs who became the &st Bishop of Digos, Davao del Sur:Msgr. Generoso Camiha. The focus is on all of the PME Fathers wholabored tirelessly proclaiming the Gospel, building Christian communities, caring for the people, fostering vocations to the priesthoodand the religious life. This is the work of the PMEs in Davao.

The people remember the work of the PME Fathers.

Fr. Reindeau baptized me. Fr. Sabourin officiated at our wedding. Fr. Lemay took care of my mother in the hospital when she was dying. I served as an altar boy for Fr. Baril. Fr. Pelland helped me very much in discerning my vocation to the priesthood. remember Fr.Pelletier in Bansalan. I remember Fr. Vallieres in Calinan.

The remembrances of the people could go on and on. Perhaps,this is the most significant achievement of the PME Fathers. Peopleremember the years, the men, and the work. It was hard work; itwas humble work; it was work close to the people. The fifty yearsare remembered and cherished not only by the people but by the PME’s themselves. For it has not only been fifty years of giving; it has also been fifty years of receiving, receiving the gift of being with the Filipino people.

Indeed, the missionary experience is realizing the gift of mutual sharing; it is realizing the Church of mutual gifts. There is an interaction of two cultures, and what is created thereby is a gift of the Spirit. It is a humanizing experience, an experience essential for the Church. Fr. Pierre Fisette has described this experience:

When I go back to Canada for my furlough, 1 am struck by what the Canadian people tell me. They say, “You are Canadian, but somehowyou are different from the other Canadian priests we know. You havetime for us. You have time to listen to us. You have time just to bewith us.” These are the special gifts the Filipino people have given us:the gift of appreciating and cherishing the person, the gift of sensitivity, the gift of having time for people. I am very grateful for thesegifts. I have been enriched so much by my missionary experience in the Philippines, and most especially by my work with the Tribal Filipinos

This realization of the experience of mutuality, of the exchange of gifts, is a memory to cherish for the PME Fathers.

Looking Forward

In the 1960’s, there were more than eighty PME Fathers in theDavao region, now there are less than forty. The PME Fathers havebuilt up the local Church of Davao and have tumed it over to theFilipino clergy. Most of the PME’s are old; the average age is aboutsixty. Only eight of them are below the age of fifty: four are in Jolo,working amidst the Muslims; three are in the parish in Malita, Davaodel Sur, working with the Tribal Filipinos, and one is in Holy CrossCollege of Davao. The local Church of Davao still needs the PME Fathers, but now the need is for an accompanying presence, to fillin where needed, to be of service to the diocesan priests. This isindeed their new call, their new challenge, and they are responding as gracefully as ever.

It is significant to note that it is only within the past fifteen years or so that the PME Fathers have been able to undertake the mission that they had originally come to Davao for: to work with the non-Christians. The rapid expansion of population due to the influx ofsettlers necessitated the PMEs responding to the challenge of meetingtheir pastoral needs and setting up Christian communities for them.Now, that this has been accomplished and tumed over to the local clergy, those PMEs who are willing and able to do so are free to undertake the mission of initial evangelization among the Tribal Filipinos. The work of Frs. Samson, Belanger, and Fisette here has been innovative and dynamic, employing the holistic approach of integral evangelization: combining evangelization and catecheticswith the promotion of literacy, agriculture, and health projects. They are joined in this special mission by two diocesan clergy from the Digos Diocese; Fr. Santos Villahermosa and Fr. Rudy Tulibas, several religious sisters from the Missionaries of the ImmaculateConception (M.I.C.) and Presentation of Mary (P.M.) congregations,pinos. 2 and a team of laity, many from the tribal communities themselves. The pastoral approaches and experiences in this apostolate are gifts that should be shared with the wider Church.

We have spoken much of gifts. That is natural for the celebration of a Golden Anniversary of pastoral service. There is one more gift to mention, however, the return gift. The PME Fathers have been a gift of the Church of Quebec, Canada to the Church of Davao, Philippines. Now, the local Church of Davao, Philippines, returns thegift. The young, dynamic Church of Davao, alive with a strong faithand new pastoral approaches, attempting to promote an integral,holistic approach to evangelization, allowing the Gospel to permeate every human situation as it struggles vwth severe socio-economic and political difficulties, says to the Church of Quebec, the Church of Canada, “Thank you for helping us; thank you for evangelizing us; thank you for building us up. Most of all, thank you for the PME Fathers. What they have learned in being with us, they share now with you. They have been your gift to us. They are now our gift to you”

***Appendix 1
PME FATHERS ASSIGNED IN DAVAO WITH THE YEAR OF THEIR FIRST ARRIVAL
[Refer to the PDF file, pg. 17]***

A Report on Four M.A Theses on Integral Evangelization

One of the key by-words immediately before, during and immediately after Vatican Council  II was “reading the signs of the times”. This expression though somewhat of a cliche right now, characterizes the spirit of the post-Vatican II Church and its deep longing to respond to the “joys and hope, the grief and anxieties of the men of this age, especially those who are poor or in a any way afflicted.” A very significant off-shoot of the realization that evangelization must take as its starting point the concrete realities of the world in which we live–which is basically what the “signs of the times” refers to–is the notion of “Integral Evangelization Evangelii Nuntiandi and adopted by the Theology Division of the Ateneo de Davao University as the basic framework of our teaching and research. This article is an attempt to summarize and integrate the more significant elements in the masteral theses done by four of our Graduate Students during the past 5 years in connection with Integral Evangelization.
Three of the theses are concerned with various aspects of Integral Evangelization in the context religious formation in specific Catholic schools and the fourth attempts to evaluate a Church-based formation program from the same perspective. In choosing a school context, the researchers expressed similar motives for for that choice. The most immediate motivating  factor was that they are all involved in religious education in one of other of the schools under study. They therefore expressed the hope that the fruits of their studies would provide a concrete basis for evaluating and improving the efforts of their various institutions to foster Integral Evangelization in their school communities. They attempted to justify this concern on several grounds, the most basic of which was the challenge of Pope Paul VI, already mentioned above, and the general directives of the Congregation for Catholic Education for Catholic Schools which make it clear that effective religious formation must have as one  of its main concerns the need to prepare those being formed to live a meaningful and relevant Christian life in the midst of the concrete realities of the world of today. The urgency of taking these directives  seriously was heightened for them by the result of several general surveys, conducted by various groups, that showed a basic gap between the content of many religious  education programs and the daily lives of those who had been exposed  to them. This in addition to the often heard criticism of Catholic schools as being contributors to rather than providers of solutions  to the dehumanizing socio-economic and political realities of most Christian Third World countries, has admittedly made them aware if the need to make a more conscious effort to promote Integral Evangilization in the schools they studied.
In addition to the factors already mentioned above as contributory to the choice Integral Evangelization as the basis  for these studies, another closely related issue is the widespread influence of the so-called “Theology of Liberation” that has made such a profound impact on theological reflection in Third World countries like the Philippines. As noted especially by Sr. Florencia Isidor, P.M., in her thesis, the complexities of this theological approach and the confusion that it has caused make it imperative that any attempt to apply the principles of Integral Evangelization follow closely the basic guidelines given by Pope Paul VI in Evangelii Nuntiandi. Her study is more directly involved with this aspect of the question than the other three.

PERCEPTION OF EVANGELIZATION

    The thesis of Sr. Florencia, entitled “A Theological Analysis of the Perception of Evangelization Among the Faculty and Staff of Two Presentation of Mary Schools”, was an attempt to determine the basic theological orientation of the Faculty and Staff of St. Peter’s College (SPC) of Toril and Holy Cross College of Calinan (HCCC), both in Davao City. (Her reason for focusing on the Faculty and Staff, rather than on the students, in her belief that the agents of Christian Formation are crucial to an effective program of education.) The basic instrument for the study was a questionnaire made up of 30 statements which reflected three different orientations, namely, a more traditional (i.e., pre-Vatican II) orientation; an Integral Evangelization orientation; and a secularist (i.e., an irreligious) orientation.
Before discussing the results of the study, it might be of help to look at one attempt to identify the distinguishing characteristics of the first two orientations mentioned above. The third orientation simply means either denying or ignoring any religious or theological dimensions to the task of responding actively to the socio-political and economic problems with which Integral Evangelization is concerned. In an  article written to clarify some of the issues raised by Pope Paul VI’s discussion of Integral Evangelization approaches or orientations. The first distinction made by Fr. Arevalo focused on the basic definition of evangelization  itself as characteristically understood by each orientation. Thus, the tradition orientation would stress the word aspect while the Integral Evangelization approach would stress more the witness aspect of evangelization. The main elements in each approach would look something like this:

Word                                                                                   Witness

explicit preaching of the                                  living out in one’s

kerygma, catechesis, the                                own life one’s under-

formation of the Church                                 standing of the Gospel

community, the sacramental                       in diakonia (ser-

apostolate, pastoral                                           vice to the world in

activity, (explicitly)                                            its own structures and

Christian and ecclesial                                  activities), incarna-

presence and action.                                       ting the meanings and values of the Gospel in secular tasks and in temporal areas.

      With regard to the content of evangelization, Fr. Arevalo once again suggests a few characteristic differences in the matter of focus or stress more or less distinctive of each of the two approaches under discussion:

        Traditional                                                                          Integral

– salvation, mission, “divinization”                        -development, liberation,

                                                                                                           humanization

-the Church, institution,                                                – the “direct action”

 ministry, structures,magis-                                       of the Holy Spirit in

terium, “from above” ele-                                            of the Holy Spirit in

ments                                                                                         the Church; them charismatic, “from below” elements

-the “Christological” elements                           – the “pneumatological”

(papacy, episcopacy, apostolic                               elements (grace, cha-

succession)                                                                           risms, the “vertical”)

-focus on salvation history and                         – focus on the world and

 the Church                                                                         on “what is going   on

 -universal Church; leadership                       – local Church; creat

of Rome, pole of university                                    vity in communities

and unity                                                                             the “periphery”; pole

                                                                                                   of plurality, diversity

 -the tasks of holiness; inner                            – the tasks of justice

 life of faith                                                                        in the world

      As noted by Sr. Florencia, the samples of divergence in stress given above could be extended indefinitely. But it should be noted that the above distinctions are not meant to imply that those who stress one aspect deny the other. It is just a matter of priority. However, the choice of point of departure or area of focus is of no small importance. To avoid falling into “exclusivism” in carrying out our evangelizing responsibility, it is helpful to note the profound links between evangelization and human development stressed by Pope Paul IV in the apostolic exhortation mentioned above, namely the a) anthropological links, b) theological links, and c) evangelical links.
The anthropological links arise because of the fact that the Gospel is preached to men in their concrete situations and are subject to socio-economic and cultural questions.
The theological links arise because of the intimate connection between the mysteries of creation and redemption. They are inseparable and the full  development and liberation of created realities can only be achieved ultimately through the mystery of the redemption. They are inseparable and the full development and liberation of created realities can only  be achieved  ultimately through the mystery of the redemptive Incarnation of Christ. A theology of terrestrial realities must open out to a theology of redemption, and political theology has no ultimate significance if it excludes the eschatological finality of mankind and his struggles.
The evangelical links, which are those of charity, touch the very concrete situations of injustice to be combatted and of justice to be restored. There is no love of God without love of neighbor and no love of God without love of neighbor and no love of neighbor which does not include justice, equality, truth and peace. Consequently, it would be impossible to truly preach the Gospel without concern for the full liberation and development of man and his world.
Integral Evangelization, therefore, is evangelization which is not restricted only to the religious field (traditional approach) but also includes the promotion of human development  and liberation as an integral  But it in contrast to the secularistic approach to the latter it seeks their ultimate fulfillment and meaning in the transcendent and eschatological realities of faith. As for the results of Sr. Florencia’s study, she observed that there was a high degree of “Uncertainty” or ambiguity manifested by both Faculty and Staff of both schools with regard to the majority ( each ) of, the traditional and secularist statements whereas the perception of nine of the Integral Evangelization statements proved to be “Positive”. The tenth was rated “Highly Positive”. She attributed the uncertainty or ambiguity of the perceptions regarding the traditional and secularistic statements to several factors, namely:

1. The ambiguity of some of the statements, especially in the secularistic group.

2. The complicated reality of the perception of evangelization due, in part, to the complexity of Integral Evangelization itself.

3 The existing theological confusion which besets the Church today due, again in part, to the fact that the theological  thrusts in the different interpretations of these documents, depending on one’s  basic theological orientation and type involvement in the world, add up to further confusion.

4. Inconsistency between the content of lectures,  in-service training sessions, readings in the theological books and journals etc. and the orientation of the parishes where one lives and worships also accounts for some degree of uncertainty in perceiving the true nature of evangelization.

With regard to the data gathered in relation to the Integral Evangelization statements, Sr. Florencia concluded that, for the mod 9% part, it could be said that the perception of evangelization among both the Faculty and Staff of the two schools studied is fundamental consistent with the norms explicitated by Pope Paul VI in Evangelii Nuntiandi. She attributes this fact to the conscious efforts made over the past few years to foster this perception in their various Faculty and Staff development programs and activities,

On the basis of the findings and conclusions arrived at in her study, Sr. Isidor offered the following recommendation:

1. That a follow-up study be undertaken to explore the respondents integral perception of evangelization by examining the actions and community involvement.

2. That the perception of evangelization of the students be likewise ascertained as another follow-up of her study.

3 That research be done along similar lines of study, using wider population and involving more schools.

4. That, in. order – to clear out the “Uncertainties” of the respondents, the administrators of the two schools studied envision a Faculty and Staff Development Program that will continue t° promote even more effectively Integral Evangelization.

5. That future users of her questionnaire revise the ambiguous statements so that there will be clearer distinctions between tits’ traditional, integral and secularistic statements.

AN   EVALUATION OP A SCHOOL PROGRAM

The second school-based thesis to be discussed in this report is that of Sr. Ma Edna O. Cueva, O.P. entitled “An Evaluation of the Program of St. Vincent High School of Maragusan in Promoting Integral Evangelization”. The school evaluated is one of the twenty-two parochial by the Dominican Sisters of  owned by the Diocese of Tagurn but is n-`1,,, rs of the Trinity. It is a sectarian, co-education

secondary school located at Maragusan, San Mariano, Davao del Norte. Its basic geographical setting is rural and the students studying there come from a wide variety of elementary schools located in neighboring poblacions, nearby sitios, and remote barrios of San Mariano. The basic goal of the study was to determine the degree to which the religious instruction program and other secular courses and activities contribute to the integral formation of the students. The instrument used was a complex questionnaire consisting of 18 statements reflecting the various elements in the overall educational program of the school and formulated in such a way as to reflect the Integral Evangelization attitudes or patterns of thought that the study sought to measure. Each statement called for a weighted response of either Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Not Sure, Agree, or Strongly Agree t some statements were also followed by specific items of a more concrete or practical nature which called for a simple check or some degree of ranking. Fifty students, chosen randomly from each year level, made up the respondents.

As reported by Sr. Cueva in the “Summary and Conclusion section of her thesis, the data gathered in her study showed that St. Vincent High School, through its religious instruction program, promotes spiritual growth among the students by inculcating in the minds of the respondents that: a) God loves them and so they must love Him in return by hearing Mass, obeying the Commandments and helping their neighbor; b) God’s closeness to man is experienced individual and group prayer; c) man needs to pray continuously; d) Jesus has come to initiate the Kingdom of God in the world, and the risk of continuing His work is left to all members of the Church; e) the
Christ lives and works among us through the sacraments, reception of the Holy Eucharist is important; f) weekly Bible reading is important for every Christian; g) Mary is the Mother of Jesus, the Mother of God, the Mother of the Church and their Mother; h) properly participating in the responses and singing at Mass is a way of following their oneness with the Eucharistic Sacrifice of Jesus; and i) the Mass is both a sacrifice and a sacred meal.

With regard to the other courses in the curriculum, the survey data showed that they promote social growth among the students by giving stress to the following: a) one’s obligation as a Christian to give praise and thanksgiving to God and to obey His Commandments; b) sharing with those in need to fulfill God’s Commandment; c) improving one’s relationships with others in order to have many friends,tit, e snow one’s love for God, and to be a real child of God; d) the  realization of one’s s God-given talents and abilities which helped them learn to respect people who earn their living through physical labor, the value of working with others, and the value of productive activity; e) the discovery of the wonders and beauty of God’s creation and the need to show their gratitude to God by using all that God has made for the advantage of all men and by respecting the unique reality of all creatures; f) becoming better Filipinos by developing in them a greater interest in knowing more about their culture and traditions, respect for their fellow Filipinos, and appreciation of the value of having a national language of their own; g) the responsibilities of being a Filipino citizen: loving one’s country next to God, respecting the flag, obeying the fundamental laws of the land and defending their country against its enemies; h) becoming better members of society by sharing one’s talents and abilities with the community, working for the common good and by cultivating a spirit of good sportsmanship; i) encouraging participation in parish activities and organizations such as: Sunday Masses, Wednesday Novenas, KSP, Holy Hour, charismatic prayer meetings, GKK, Legion of Mary, parish choir, and catechetical apostolate activities.

The conclusions drawn from the above data were the following:

1. The religious instruction at St. Vincent High School promotes spiritual growth among the students by emphasizing doctrines, prayers, devotions, and sacraments. It has thus stressed the liturgical and obediential dimensions of religious formation more than the communal, social and service-oriented dimensions.

2. The instructions presented in the other academic courses promote social growth among the students by stressing specific topics such as: respect for God, people, and country and participation in parish activities. and organizations. However, the relationship be-tween the specifically religious and the social and communal is relatively weak.

3. St. Vincent High School of Maragusan is on its way to promoting Integral Evangelization but still has a lot of room for improvement.

Among her “Recommendations for Action Planning” Sr. Edna included the following:

1. Opportunities to practice active evangelization should be fostered to remedy the weak relationship between the religious aspect -of formation and the students’ social and communal response. This weakness could be remedied by active involvement in extra-curricular activities fostering Integral Evangelization.

2. The classroom subject teachers should be motivated to deepen the students’ values by relating their subject matter to the practical concerns of living and by helping them strengthen and integrate their religious and social values.

3. The Christian Living Program should integrate in its teaching process a practical application of what is learned in the classroom because the concrete practice of what is learned there now is found to be weak.

4. The activities of the different courses should give appropriate training for the students to participate in activities and organizations in the wider community.

By way of “Recommendations for Future Research” Sr. Cueva suggests that, since there is a common pastoral program in the Diocese of Tagum, a study should be conducted to compare the program of St. Vincent High School of Maragusan with the programs of other Catholic Schools in the Diocese to see how widespread and effective the efforts to promote Integral Evangelization in the educational apostolate of the Diocese really are. She also suggests that since her study was conducted in a secondary school in a rural setting, future studies should also be conducted in secondary schools in an urban setting as well as in both rural and urban elementary and tertiary schools.

A THEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED NEEDS
Sr. Agueda Pahang, 0.P.’s thesis, entitled “A Theological Study of the Perceived Needs of the San Pedro College Community Regarding Christian Formation”, provides the basis for the third part of this report. As is clear from the title, the purpose of the study analyzed in this  thesis was to determine the perceived sectoral and communitarian needs of the Students, Faculty and Staff of San Pedro College, a Catholic school run by the Dominican Sisters of the Trinity in the heart of Davao City. The respondents in the study consisted of 217 students randomly chosen from among 500 students, 30 faculty members and 31 staff members or all those who responded to the invitation extended to the whole Faculty and Staff. The instrument used Consisted of five pages of dosed and open-ended questions, the former appearing in the form of two sets of statements geared towards determining  latter used to further clarify and expand the data gotten from the the two main forms of perception being studied and the closed statements. For the sake of statistical analysis, the respondents were asked to check one of five spaces at the end of each statement depending on whether they perceived the meeting of the particular need as Not Existing, Very Inadequate, Inadequate, Adequate or Very Adequate. Each response was given a properly weighted value for determining statiscally the significance of that response for determining the level of perceived need for that particular item.

It should be noted that, although the expression . “Integral Evangelization” rarely if ever appears in the course of the study, the general framework of the study reflects the integral approach to evangelization that we are concerned with here. As will be noted by consulting the questionnaire used, the various perceptions being measured were grouped according to three main categories which reflect the three main dimensions of evangelization: Word /Doctrine or the more conceptual or cognitive aspect; Worship/Memory or the more devotional or affective aspect; and Witness/Morals or the more value-oriented or behavioural aspect!’ The latter would include the more solo-political, economic and cultural concerns most distinctive of the specifically “integral” dimension of evangelization.

The data collected and analyzed in this study revealed that the type of need the Faculty, Staff and Students all perceived as “Most Urgent” or “Least Adequately” met in their own lives was Worship/ Memory. With regard to the other two types of needs, Witness/ Morals and Word/Doctrine, the perception of all three sectors was that they are “Adequately” and “Very Adequately” met, respectively, by the school’s programs, at least on the personal or sectoral level. During the interviews, respondents admitted that the signs of the times: escalating economic crisis, the peace and order situation and other insecurities are what led them to perceive Worship/Memory as their greatest personal perceived need. They feel the need to build up firm trust and confidence in God’s saving action. They are hopeful, however, that the Lord will liberate them from their present difficulties. Apparently, closer union with the Lord in the Liturgy and other forms of commemorating His sacrifice deeds are called for to strengthen them.

With regard to perceived community needs, however, all three sectors differed in their perceptions. For the Staff it was Worship/ Memory, for the Faculty it was Witness/Morals and for the Students it was Word/Doctrine. Thus, only the Staff had the same perception as to personal and communal needs. In her interpretation of the above data, Sr. Pahang observed that the Faculty, as the older and, hopefully, more mature and aware sector of the community, were expectedly also the most sensitive to the serious socio-political and economic problems in the wider community and to the Christian responsibility all share to bring their faith to bear on finding solutions and removing the causes of these basically moral issues. The Staff, however, seems to be least aware of these issues as their greatest perceived community need is Worship/Memory and their least urgent perceived community need is Witness/Morals. Perhaps this is related to the fact that, as shown in the discussion of one of the Sub-Problems in the study, there is a definite correlation between years of formal religious education and perception of need in the area of Witness/Morals. Perhaps, also, their concrete situation is such that they feel more sharply the hard economic and other realities of life than the other sectors and therefore feel a greater need for Worship/Memory. As far as the Student sector is concerned, their perception of the greatest community need is Word/ Doctrine even though this is ranked third as a personal need. Perhaps this can be interpreted as a sign that for them religion or religious formation is primarily intellectual and they have not yet been helped sufficiently to recognize the need for participation in seeking solutions to the concrete problems of the community by rendering service in compassionate response to the less fortunate. They seem rather to have been reared in very over-protective environments that deprived them of their being exposed to the situation where the evils of society are happening. In addition to the main problem of determining the various perceptions of the Students, Faculty and Staff of SPC with regard to the three main components of Religious Formation, an attempt was made to determine the degree of correlation, if any, between perceptions of needs and such variables as sex, age, and number of years of formal religious instruction. This further study revealed that there is no correlation between sex and perception of needs in the three specified areas, whereas age influences one’s perceptions in all three areas and the number of years of formal religious education has an effect only on one’s perceptions of Word/Doctrine, regarding need for Word/Doctrine and Witness/Morals. By way of recommendations, Sr. Pahang suggested
1. In overall planning, formulation of policies, creation of pro-grams/curricula, and other similar activities, a balance or integration Worship/Memory, and Witness/Morals be given due consideration while attending to the present individual needs of the different sectors of the community. In the light of the above findings, it is clear that there is a need to intensify the program on religious activities with the active participation of the Campus Ministry team members and other resource persons.

2. The Administration start the faculty development program right from the hiring stage and continue it through on-going formation programs, with continuous evaluation for promotion. In the selection of faculty, their philosophy of life and philosophy of education should be looked into, making sure it is in consonance with that of the school. Regular participation in faculty on-going formation must also be required of them.

3. In response to the Faculty’s perception of a general need in the community for better formation in the area of Witness/Morals, they, as the formal educators in the community, should be given the opportunity to continue their own formation with regard to content and pedagogy in this area and be continually evaluated by all sectors on their performance.

4. The perceived needs of the Staff with regard to Worship/ Memory must also be met by planning, organizing and implementing appropriate activities by the Campus Ministry staff in collaboration with representatives of the general Staff sector.

5. While responding to the perception of the Students that the greatest community need is in the area of Word/Doctrine, and keeping in mind their perception that on the sectoral level this is the least of their perceived needs, formulation of curricula and syllable should be carried out in such a way that the danger of dwelling too much on the doctrinal aspect and neglecting practice be avoided. To do this, due recognition must be given to all three of the basic dimensions of Christian Formation: Word, Worship and Witness. Right from the start, the students should be trained to be more service oriented. It would be most helpful to this end to utilize the social teaching of the Church and effective exposure programs. The idealism characteristic of their age should be tapped.

6. A systematic kind of program, comprehensive enough to meet everyone’s need to live a full Christian life, should be initiated by the Administration and participated in by all sectors in such a way that each member of the SPC community will become more aware of and responsive to the basic needs of its own community and of society as well. The program must integrate Word, Witness and Worship in such a way that it will not only seek to meet immediate problems but, foster the on-going Christian formation of both the individual and the community.

Additional recommendations were made to promote further research, namely,

1. A study of the role which religious education plays in the formation of positive attitudes and values among students and in carrying out the present general educational objectives under PD 6-A Educational Act of 1972.

2. A study of the practices and accomplishments of meaningful and relevant to students.

3. A study of conditions favorable for instructors in integrating the religious dimension in their secular subjects.

AN EVALUATION OF THE EVANGELIZATION SEMINAR
The fourth, and final, thesis to be included in this report is that of Dolores G. Gabisan and is entitled “An Evaluation of the Evangelization Seminar in the Archdiocese of Davao”.9 The fundamental ecclesiastical framework in which this seminar is conducted is that of the Basic Christian /Ecclesial Community (BCC /BEC) which by its very nature and orientation is geared towards the promotion of “Integral Evangelization”. This framework has its roots in the Third World context of Latin America where “Liberation Theology” was also born in Hence, it is fitting that such a study be undertaken in order to monitor the level of effectiveness of the concrete evangelization program of the Archdiocese of Davao, which, as part of the Third World, is formally committed to the building of DEC’s through its various pastoral programs.

As was true of the three theses already discussed, the basic document used in the process of evaluation was Pope Paul VI’s Evangelii Nuntiandi. .The evaluation itself focused on three main aspects of the program: the Rollos or the content of the various input sessions, the rollistas or facilitators of the learning sessions and the participants themselves. The first part of the evaluation was conducted merely by analyzing the content of the individual rollos in the light of the Holy Father’s guidelines as explicited in Evangelii Nuntiandi with the help of the Core Group 1 rollistas (22 participants of earlier seminars now facilitating subsequent seminars). The second and, third parts were carried out by analyzing the responses of the 46 facilitators of the actual seminar being evaluated (Core Group 2 ) and of the . 93 participants of that seminar to a series of fictional situations designed to reflect one or other of the 14 criteria for Integral Evangelization. As is usually the case in statistical studies like this one, responses consisted of checking one’s reaction to each of the situations presented according to five basic possibilities: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Uncertain, Agree or Strongly Agree, with each response being given the proper weighting for statistical use.

Without going into details here, the result of the first part of the evaluation led to the conclusion-that each of the rollos contained one or more of the specific elements proper to an integral approach to evangelization, at least implicitly. In some cases, the integral orientation was quite dear, in others less dear; but in all cases both the researcher and the Core Group 1 respondents recognized its presence to some degree,though the latter manifested some uncertainty about the orientation of rollos 4, 5 and 6. Thus the content of the seminar seems to be substantially reflective of the basic orientation of Integral Evangelization, even though it is dear that there is definitely room for improvement.

Before going into the specific results of the survey of responses of facilitators and participants in the particular seminar being evaluated, it might be of help to note some of the profile data of about the 93 participant respondents. The first thing to note is that they were randomly chosen from among eligible respondents coming from five different parishes, each representing one or other of the five pastoral zones of the Archdiocese of Davao: Toril, Sasa, Sta. Ana, Penaplata, and San Pedro. The five parishes randomly chosen from these zones were Sto. Rosario, St. Joseph the Worker, San Antonio, Virgen Dolorosa and San Pedro parishes respectively. Other significant data would include the following: 68 percent were females and only 32 percent were males; 59 percent were youth and 41 percent were adults; 44 percent were employees while- 30 percent were housewives and 12 percent were students; the rest (14 percent) were made up of teachers, businessmen, farmers and-drivers. It is also interesting to note that for 93 percent of the participants, this was the first church-based seminar they had ever attended.

The “background data of the facilitators is also very enlightening. On the basis of the information provided in their profiles, the following facts came to light 72 percent of the rollistas were males; 60 percent came from the adult age group; 74 percent were married; as far as their occupations were concerned, 24 percent were teachers, 20 percent were employees, 17 percent were businessmen, and the rest were either farmers or housewives or drivers or students or fishermen. All in all, this shows the extent to which a cross-section of the local Church has gottei, involved in the work of evangelization In general, the data gathered from the survey showed that both the youth and the adults manifested a significant difference in their understanding of Integral Evangelization as a result of the Evangelization Seminar. The data further showed that the adults scored higher than the youth though the latter changed more than the former; that the males scored higher than the females though the latter changed more; that the married scored higher than the single participants and also grew more; that the professionals scored higher and changed more than the non-professionals.

With regard to the Core Group 2 Rollistas, they also manifested a significant level of understanding of the Integral Evangelization orientation, as was surely expected or at least hoped. The really significant discovery, he gever, was that the participants and the facilitators revealed the same level of understanding after the seminar. This can be taken as a measure of the effectiveness of the facilitators in their performance during the seminar.

In addition to the analysis of the Pre-Test and Post-Test data as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of the seminar on the participants from the perspective of content, the study also included observations as to the level of involvement of facilitators in the life of the parish and community as a factor in explaining their’ effectiveness as facilitators and the increased involvement of the participants them-selves in both parish And community after the seminar as a concrete proof of the success of the seminar in bringing about real changes in people’s lives.

The following recommendations were made in the light of the results of the study:

1. While nine of the twelve rollos of the Evangelization Seminar Phase I reflected dearly the basic orientation of Integral Evangelization, there is still a need to re-evaluate and broaden the context of their content so that they become even more relevant and- effective in empowering future seminarists- to respond to the concrete needs of our times.

2. The seminar should not be too rigidly structured but should allow for more processing on the part of the participants.

3. The Evangelization Seminar Phase I should be followed up by a Phase II Seminar that will further reinforce the essence of Integral Evangelization with maybe fewer rollos and more processing.

4. The Evangelization Seminar Phase I should be understood as basic to another seminars and therefore must be given priority in all the parishes of the Archdiocese.

5. Integral Evangelization should not only be the concern of the parishes alone but also integrated into school programs.

6. Core-group Rollistas should undergo a more intensive in-service training and exposure program to be more effective in lecturing and sharing their experiences with the participants in the seminar. They should also be helped to produce effective audio-visual aid materials and to devise more effective strategies to ensure continuing interest until the end of the week-long seminar.

7. Other researchers can undertake studies on other types of religious seminars being conducted in the Archdiocese that will help. to build up and strengthen Christian communities.

     CONCLUSION

In the light of these four studies on Integral Evangelization in both a school and a parish setting, we have grown in our conviction that this orientation in the Philippine Church’s on-going response to its basic mission of evangelization is not only critical and difficult but, what is more important, also possible. We have discovered that much is being done but that much more still needs to be done. It would seem that to a greater or lesser degree, the integral evangelization approach has “infiltrated” many aspects of the local Church’s efforts at Christian formation, in the sense that it seems to be more implicit than explicit in the formation programs studied. What we hope will happen as a result of these studies is that Integral Evangelization will become more and more explicitly accepted as one, if not the most, viable and effective approach to the formation of mature, knowledgeable, responsive and committed men and women who really understand and believe that we cannot preach the Good News to our world today in a truly meaningful and effective way if we do not see the intrinsic relationship between the an Faith. pursuit of Justice and the promotion of the Christian Faith.

Evangelizing Presence

Last year, when I was in Washington, D.C., I met a young French Jesuit Scholastic studying labor relations. We had an interesting conversation about the priest-worker movement in France, where priests actually live as laborers, working in factories and mines. This is an effort of the Church to enliven the faith of one of the secularized and de-Christianed sectors of a society that had once been deeply Catholic. He narrated an experience he had while living and working among factory workers as a Jesuit Novice. One day, a worker mentioned to him that he was building a model of a church out of match sticks and asked for advice on where to place the different parts of the church, such as the altar, the confessional, the bell tower. The young Jesuit Novice was happy to help him in this. Some days afterward, the worker called him and said, “I want to give this model of the Church to you.” The young novice was overwhelmed, saying, “You have worked so hard on it, why don’t you keep it. There is no need to give it to me.” The worker responded, “Please accept it. It means a lot for me to give it to you.” The worker had discovered that this young man who had been working with him was a religious preparing for the priesthood. The young Jesuit Novice’s presence in the midst of the laborers had touched him personally. He remembered the faith of his youth, the faith he had not practiced for so many years. There was awakened a yearning to return to the Church, a yearning for God. The young novice noticed a certain sadness about the laborer as he talked about the Church, almost a desire to be welcomed back into the Church. In some wonderful and mysterious way, the process of evangelization was taking place.

Here in the Philippines, the Church is alive and vibrant; the symbols of the faith are strong. Yet, there is the realization that many of the faithful are not effectively reached by the Church, and there is an increasing secularization taking place, especially among the Westernized elite. What has taken place in many European countries formerly deeply Catholic but now secularized and de-Christianized could take place here in the Philippines. The old faith that is merely cultural, traditional, and pietistic is in danger of being swept away by the winds of social change and of becoming irrelevant to the real issues of life.

The catholic Church is aware of this danger and is intensifying its efforts at promoting evangelization. However, its understanding of evangilization is key for the life and mission of the Church. One of the great papal documents in the modern Church is Pope Paul VI’s Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi, Evangelization in the Modern World, issued on December 8, 1975.

Theme the late Holy Father says that it is not enough to define evangelization in terms of proclaiming Christ to those who do not know him or of preaching, and conferring Baptism and other sacraments. (17) This is only part of the reality. Evangelization is in fact the totality of the grace and vocation proper to the Church, her deepest identity. (14) For the Church, evangelizing means bringing the Good News to all the strata of humanity and, through its influence, transforming humanity from within and making it new. (18) It is a complex process made up of varied elements which are complementary and mutually enriching. These elements include the renewal of humanity, the evangelization of culture, the primary importance of witness of life, the need of explicit proclamation of the Gospel, a vital and community acceptance, and apostolic initiative. (24) This evangelization must proclaim a transcendent and eschatological salvation in Jesus Christ, beginning in this life but fulfilled only in eternity. (27) This evangelization would not be complete if it did not take account of the unceasing interplay of the Gospel and man’s concrete life, both personal and social. (29) Between evangelization and human advancement including development and liberation there are fact profound links. (31)The message of salvation in Jesus Christ should be proclaimed without reduction or ambiguity. (32) It must envisage the whole man, in all his aspects, right up to and including his openness to the absolute, even the divine Absolute. (33)The Church is certainly not willing to restrict her mission only to the religious held and to dissociate herself from man’s temporal problems.  (34) Evangelization will never be possible without the action of the Holy Spirit. (75) Through the Holy Spirit, the Gospel penetrates to the heart of the world, for its is he who causes people to discern the signs of the times-signs willed by God- which evangelization reveals and puts to use in history. (75)

That is the heart of the teaching of Evangelii Nuntiandi, regarding the nature of authentic evangelization, a teaching that has been clearly continued by Pope John Paul II, and beautifully expressed in the Puebla Conference, the meeting of the Latin American bishops in 1979, which spoke of “liberating evangelization.” So, we ask, if this is so clearly the teaching of the Church, why is it not such a dynamic and living reality in the life of the Church? My analysis is that people simply do not understand what integral evangelization is. For many, they do not have an integral faith life. There is a dichotomy between their faith life and their human life. There is a dichotomy between their faith life and their human life. They have compartmentalized their region. Of course, all this is a matter of degree, but that is my point: there is a need for the Church to promote a more integral and holistic faith response in the lives of all its people allowing the Gospel to permeate very are of life.

In the light of the foregoing, I believe that integral evangelization is the basic vision that should permeate all activities within the Church. I have tried to foster and promote this vision in my own apostolate, especially in teaching and reflecting together with my faculty members in the Theology Department of the Ateneo de Davao University as well as with our graduate students in our Graduate Theology Program. In this issue of Tambara I want to share with you the fruit of some of these endeavors in the hope that a fuller explicitation and understanding of integral evangelization will lead to a greater actualization of a reality already present in the life of the Church, especially here in the Philippines.

Allow me to begin by defining integral evangelization: the proclaiming of the Gospel in Word and Sacrament bringing about a personal conversion impelling one to a greater involvement in the process of humanization, the process of true human development and liberation. The evangelization process must, therefore, not stop at the point of personal conversion but must lead to active involvement in the life of the Church and in fostering  the human. To stop after the experience of personal conversion without active involvement in the efforts of daily life will result in the conversion experience being lost and the person falling back to where he was before. There is too much passivity in the Church, especially among many of the laity. There is a need to promote dynamic active participation in the life and mission of the Church. The evangelized are called to become evangelizers. The evangelizer must proclaim a clear message of salvation in Jesus Christ, a message that must not divorced from life but must permeate and penetrate concretely all areas of life. Some who have experienced conversion do become active but only in spiritual activities. This is good, but it is not enough. It does not fully manifest the power of the Gospel coming into touch with the realities of people’s lives.

Furthermore, integral evangelization would be significantly actualized by promoting the following: 1) the fostering of an evangelizing presence of the Church in the world; 2) the transformation of the Church into a community of dialogue; and 3) a more effective involvement of the Church in authentic efforts for human development and liberation.

First, there is the need to define, explicitate, foster and actualize an evangelizing presence of the Church in the world. Such a presence would allow the Gospel to permeate and penetrate all areas of human endeavor and renew it from within. Why is it that so many people simply do not seem to care about the Gospel message? Why is it that so many people look upon  the Church and faith in Jesus Christ as meaningless? Why are so many caught in a materialistic way of life oblivious to spiritual values? Yet, why at the same time are so many people searching for meaning in life? There is a deep hunger in all men and women for God. Failure to respond to it has resulted in an emptiness and restlessness among them. There is a need for the Church to fill this void with the message of salvation, with the Word of God. What is needed is to explicitate and actualize this presence in symbols that would touch the deepest recesses of the human heart yearning for life, giving witness to that Mysterious Reality, the encounter with Whom will evoke the response  of a generous faith. There is a need to spell out the symbolism and signs of this evangelizing presence. Two key areas for this in the life of the Church are the fostering of community and the actualizing of mission.

This leads us to our second point: the Church should become a community of dialogue. We are only too aware that our world is a world of alienation: within ourselves, between ourselves and others, and between ourselves and God. Left to ourselves, there would be no hope of healing. Fortunately, this alienation has been shattered by the coming of Jesus Christ. He enables us to approach the Father. “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6) In enabling us to fulfill our transcendent drive to union with God, and community, Jesus enables us to become more fully human, to become more fully who we are called to be. Furthermore, he heals our brokenness and forgives our sins, enabling us to grow in wholeness and humanness through his great gift of the sacrament of reconciliation. What a pity it is that this sacrament is in such disuse these days in spite of our continuous need for conversion, for healing, for reconciliation, for forgiveness. There is a need for the Church to make this special gift present in the life of her people, in the life of the world. It is essential for full humanization. It is so necessary for our life together.

The Church should therefore become a sign and instrument of this reconciling power of Jesus, a community of dialogue in which we both challenge and support each other in our efforts at evangelizing presence.. There is a basic unity in the Church which must be realized, but we must not expect homogeneity in the Church. There are many different expressions of the faith, many different ecclesiologies, Christologies, ideologies, political orientations. A key problem in the life of the Church today is to actualize unity amidst such diversity. What a shame that such differences do not bring forth the richness of diversity but the scandal of division. Those of one position tend just to speak with those of similar positions. What is destructive of an evangelizing presence. Instead of these negative tendencies, there should be deepening of our union in the Lord Jesus Christ, and the realization that there are many ways to love this out. Among these there must be efforts at dialogue, searching for the truth together challenging each other if we believe there is no evangelizing presence in our respective approaches, and supporting each other if we believe there is. Of course, this is not easy. To do this well, we need facilitating leadership, true authority for service, able to bridge differences and bring people together. Community is always in process of becoming. A true community of dialogue is a true sign of evangelizing presence. Unless the Church is able to actualize this struggle for community within herself, how can she be a credible sign in proclaiming this to the world? Unless the Church actualizes this, she proclaims an empty word.

This leads to our third point, namely, that the Church must become significantly involved in efforts for human development and liberation. The mission of the Church is to foster and proclaim the Kingdom of God, to foster the Kingdom of love, peace, and justice in the midst of a world torn by hatred, violence, and injustice. Jesus Christ initiated this mission in his very Person. This therefore must be the mission of the Church on following her Lord. The Church must be a credible sign in fostering this mission. She cannot simply preach without action; otherwise, she preaches an irrelevant word. She must accompany her people in their journey, sharing their pain as they struggle with the Cross embedded in their personal and social situations, while manifesting the powerful presence of the Risen Lord, always a hopeful sign. To do this well, the Church must foster all aspects of its social mission: the charitable, developmental, and liberationists approaches.

To focus on only one approach would be deficient. No one approach is sufficient in itself. Yet each makes a contribution to the development, liberation, and humanization of God’s people. The charitable approach supplements the deficiencies of public services and tries to help the poor and destitute meet their basic needs. The Church has always been strong in this approach by sponsoring schools for the poor, hospitals, orphanages, low-cost housing, and nutrition and feeding programs. However, essential as the charitable approach is, it is not enough because it merely helps those in need to survive; it doesn’t make them progress. Thus, there is also the need for the developmental approach which tries to give people skills to help themselves socio-economically. The church has done this by fostering credit unions and cooperatives, promoting small-scale industries and local handicrafts, and the increase of agricultural production. Yet even these efforts are not enough because development efforts soon encounter the unjust structures in society that favor the powerful and wealthy and oppress the weak and poor. Thus, there is the need for the liberationists approach as well to make the poor aware of their own human dignity as well as the unjust structures. These people’s organizations are either community or sectorally based, such as farmers, fishermen, or urban poor groups. The poor themselves are the agents of change. However, all efforts of the Church in the social sphere should and must be guided by gospel values. Simply to engage in social action, community organizing, or conscientization efforts without being guided by and actualizing Gospel values would not to be calling forth the power of the Spirit to help in the effort. What is needed is both competence and evangelizing presence. This is true for every apostolate of the Church, whether it be charitable, developmental, or liberationist.

In fostering evangelizing presence, the Church must be contextualized, fostering the process of inculturation, going to the roots of culture, challenging and revitalizing it with the presence of God’s powerful Word. The contexts of the local Churches differ. There is certainly a difference in the contexts of First and Third World Churches, Yet, whatever the context, the basic reality is the same. One reason why many of the local Churches in the Third World experience a more dynamic faith life than their sister Churches in the First World may be that they have been forced to respond to the severe socioeconomic and political realities which have violated the humanity of their people. That response in faith has brought much vitality to the life of the Church. Perhaps the seeming irrelevance of the Church  in the First World is caused by a low level of response to the problems facing her people. This may be so because the degree of material prosperity and economic and political security in the First World seems to call for a less urgent response to the needs of the people. However, the first World Churches must realize that although the problems are different, there are also urgent demands of their people that they must respond to. Notice that I am not saying that the First World Churches are not responding to the needs of their peoples, but that the type, level, and actualization of that response clearly affects the faith life of these Churches. The local Churches of the First World can learn much from the pastoral experiences of their sister Churches in the Third World.

Ultimately, this matter of evangelizing presence leads to the question of the role of the laity in the Church. The tendency in the Catholic Church has been to depend too much on the hierarchy and the religious. This has resulted in the passivity of many of the laity. What is needed is to call them forth to a more responsible and active participation in the life and mission of the Church. Since the laity are characterized by their secular nature, they are in the privileged position of being able to bring the Gospel into every area of life: socio-economic, political, and cultural. They need a spirituality that will sustain them in their professional and familial lives. They need to be given freedom and trust to enable them to do their thing. To allow this to develop harmoniously is another critical area in the life of the Church. Their empowerment is essential for proclaiming the Gospel in every area of human endeavor. This is not to minimize the role of the hierarchy and the religious in the life of the Church. Their role will continue and even grow in the evangelizing efforts to the Church. But there is a need to further empower the laity to be true proclaimers of the Word primarily by the witness of their lives in their everyday activities.

The challenge the Church faces today therefore is the degree of its actualization of integral evangelization. Of course, it is there in the life of the Church, but there is a need to intensify the vitality and dynamism of its presence, allowing the Spirit to move within history with meaningful symbols, awakening within the yearning hearts of men and women an authentic experience of life and fulfillment made possible through Jesus Christ. This is the evangelizing presence that the world needs and has a right to demand from the Church today.